[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <qweowkm4wlfzovp3qhtkzbybeampodtwmpbp2kbtiqcrhmjtdt@syk4itfkpmfr>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 13:29:32 +0200
From: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>
To: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>
Cc: cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 6/9] selftests: cgroup: Add basic tests for
pids controller
On Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 02:37:44AM +0500, Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com> wrote:
> The
> ksft_print_header();
> ksft_set_plan(total_number_of_tests);
> are missing. Please use all of the ksft APIs to make the test TAP compliant.
Will do.
> > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tests); i++) {
> > + switch (tests[i].fn(root)) {
> > + case KSFT_PASS:
> > + ksft_test_result_pass("%s\n", tests[i].name);
> > + break;
> > + case KSFT_SKIP:
> > + ksft_test_result_skip("%s\n", tests[i].name);
> > + break;
> > + default:
> > + ret = EXIT_FAILURE;
> > + ksft_test_result_fail("%s\n", tests[i].name);
> > + break;
> Use ksft_test_result_report() instead of swith-case here.
Do you mean ksft_test_result()? That one cannot distinguish the
KSFT_SKIP case.
Or ksft_test_result_code(tests[i].fn(root), tests[i].name)?
Would the existing ksft_test_resul_*() calls inside switch-case still
TAP-work?
Thanks,
Michal
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists