[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEEQ3wnsOJXEMspM=A1jLkuLC-Ny5DA0_W-8ngE6n-jiJcDEnw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 14:11:07 +0800
From: yunhui cui <cuiyunhui@...edance.com>
To: rafael@...nel.org, lenb@...nel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, paul.walmsley@...ive.com, palmer@...belt.com,
aou@...s.berkeley.edu, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
james.morse@....com, jhugo@...eaurora.org, jeremy.linton@....com,
john.garry@...wei.com, Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com, pierre.gondois@....com,
sudeep.holla@....com, tiantao6@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ACPI: PPTT: Populate cacheinfo entirely with PPTT
Added committers of pptt.c. Could you give some comments? thanks.
On Sun, Apr 7, 2024 at 8:39 PM Yunhui Cui <cuiyunhui@...edance.com> wrote:
>
> When the type and level information of this_leaf cannot be obtained
> from arch, cacheinfo is completely filled in with the content of PPTT.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yunhui Cui <cuiyunhui@...edance.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/pptt.c | 135 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 124 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pptt.c b/drivers/acpi/pptt.c
> index a35dd0e41c27..6c54fc8e3039 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pptt.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pptt.c
> @@ -21,6 +21,9 @@
> #include <linux/cacheinfo.h>
> #include <acpi/processor.h>
>
> +void acpi_fill_cacheinfo(struct acpi_pptt_cache *cache, struct acpi_table_header *table,
> + int cpu, int level, int *index);
> +
> static struct acpi_subtable_header *fetch_pptt_subtable(struct acpi_table_header *table_hdr,
> u32 pptt_ref)
> {
> @@ -77,6 +80,18 @@ static inline bool acpi_pptt_match_type(int table_type, int type)
> table_type & ACPI_PPTT_CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED & type);
> }
>
> +static inline u32 get_cache_id(struct acpi_pptt_cache *cache)
> +{
> + struct acpi_pptt_cache_v1 *cache_v1;
> +
> + if (cache->flags & ACPI_PPTT_CACHE_ID_VALID) {
> + cache_v1 = ACPI_ADD_PTR(struct acpi_pptt_cache_v1,
> + cache, sizeof(struct acpi_pptt_cache));
> + return cache_v1->cache_id;
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * acpi_pptt_walk_cache() - Attempt to find the requested acpi_pptt_cache
> * @table_hdr: Pointer to the head of the PPTT table
> @@ -104,7 +119,7 @@ static unsigned int acpi_pptt_walk_cache(struct acpi_table_header *table_hdr,
> unsigned int *split_levels,
> struct acpi_subtable_header *res,
> struct acpi_pptt_cache **found,
> - unsigned int level, int type)
> + unsigned int level, int type, int cpu, int *index)
> {
> struct acpi_pptt_cache *cache;
>
> @@ -125,7 +140,7 @@ static unsigned int acpi_pptt_walk_cache(struct acpi_table_header *table_hdr,
> acpi_pptt_match_type(cache->attributes, ACPI_PPTT_CACHE_TYPE_INSTR)))
> *split_levels = local_level;
>
> - if (local_level == level &&
> + if (level && local_level == level &&
> acpi_pptt_match_type(cache->attributes, type)) {
> if (*found != NULL && cache != *found)
> pr_warn("Found duplicate cache level/type unable to determine uniqueness\n");
> @@ -137,7 +152,9 @@ static unsigned int acpi_pptt_walk_cache(struct acpi_table_header *table_hdr,
> * to verify that we don't find a duplicate
> * cache node.
> */
> - }
> + } else
> + acpi_fill_cacheinfo(cache, table_hdr, cpu, local_level, index);
> +
> cache = fetch_pptt_cache(table_hdr, cache->next_level_of_cache);
> }
> return local_level;
> @@ -147,7 +164,7 @@ static struct acpi_pptt_cache *
> acpi_find_cache_level(struct acpi_table_header *table_hdr,
> struct acpi_pptt_processor *cpu_node,
> unsigned int *starting_level, unsigned int *split_levels,
> - unsigned int level, int type)
> + unsigned int level, int type, int cpu, int *index)
> {
> struct acpi_subtable_header *res;
> unsigned int number_of_levels = *starting_level;
> @@ -161,7 +178,8 @@ acpi_find_cache_level(struct acpi_table_header *table_hdr,
>
> local_level = acpi_pptt_walk_cache(table_hdr, *starting_level,
> split_levels, res, &ret,
> - level, type);
> + level, type, cpu, index);
> +
> /*
> * we are looking for the max depth. Since its potentially
> * possible for a given node to have resources with differing
> @@ -197,7 +215,7 @@ static void acpi_count_levels(struct acpi_table_header *table_hdr,
> unsigned int *levels, unsigned int *split_levels)
> {
> do {
> - acpi_find_cache_level(table_hdr, cpu_node, levels, split_levels, 0, 0);
> + acpi_find_cache_level(table_hdr, cpu_node, levels, split_levels, 0, 0, 0, NULL);
> cpu_node = fetch_pptt_node(table_hdr, cpu_node->parent);
> } while (cpu_node);
> }
> @@ -316,6 +334,7 @@ static u8 acpi_cache_type(enum cache_type type)
> }
>
> static struct acpi_pptt_cache *acpi_find_cache_node(struct acpi_table_header *table_hdr,
> + int cpu,
> u32 acpi_cpu_id,
> enum cache_type type,
> unsigned int level,
> @@ -325,6 +344,7 @@ static struct acpi_pptt_cache *acpi_find_cache_node(struct acpi_table_header *ta
> struct acpi_pptt_cache *found = NULL;
> struct acpi_pptt_processor *cpu_node;
> u8 acpi_type = acpi_cache_type(type);
> + int index = 0;
>
> pr_debug("Looking for CPU %d's level %u cache type %d\n",
> acpi_cpu_id, level, acpi_type);
> @@ -333,7 +353,7 @@ static struct acpi_pptt_cache *acpi_find_cache_node(struct acpi_table_header *ta
>
> while (cpu_node && !found) {
> found = acpi_find_cache_level(table_hdr, cpu_node,
> - &total_levels, NULL, level, acpi_type);
> + &total_levels, NULL, level, acpi_type, cpu, &index);
> *node = cpu_node;
> cpu_node = fetch_pptt_node(table_hdr, cpu_node->parent);
> }
> @@ -406,8 +426,14 @@ static void update_cache_properties(struct cacheinfo *this_leaf,
> * specified in PPTT.
> */
> if (this_leaf->type == CACHE_TYPE_NOCACHE &&
> - found_cache->flags & ACPI_PPTT_CACHE_TYPE_VALID)
> - this_leaf->type = CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED;
> + found_cache->flags & ACPI_PPTT_CACHE_TYPE_VALID) {
> + if (acpi_pptt_match_type(found_cache->attributes, ACPI_PPTT_CACHE_TYPE_DATA))
> + this_leaf->type = CACHE_TYPE_DATA;
> + if (acpi_pptt_match_type(found_cache->attributes, ACPI_PPTT_CACHE_TYPE_INSTR))
> + this_leaf->type = CACHE_TYPE_INST;
> + if (acpi_pptt_match_type(found_cache->attributes, ACPI_PPTT_CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED))
> + this_leaf->type = CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED;
> + }
>
> if (revision >= 3 && (found_cache->flags & ACPI_PPTT_CACHE_ID_VALID)) {
> found_cache_v1 = ACPI_ADD_PTR(struct acpi_pptt_cache_v1,
> @@ -417,19 +443,106 @@ static void update_cache_properties(struct cacheinfo *this_leaf,
> }
> }
>
> +static bool cache_is_filled_id(struct acpi_pptt_cache *cache, int cpu)
> +{
> + u32 id = get_cache_id(cache);
> + struct cpu_cacheinfo *this_cpu_ci = get_cpu_cacheinfo(cpu);
> + struct cacheinfo *this_leaf;
> + int index = 0;
> +
> + while (index < get_cpu_cacheinfo(cpu)->num_leaves) {
> + this_leaf = this_cpu_ci->info_list + index;
> + if (this_leaf->id == id)
> + return true;
> + index++;
> + }
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> +static bool cache_is_filled_content(struct acpi_pptt_cache *cache,
> + struct acpi_table_header *table,
> + int cpu, int level, u8 revision)
> +{
> + struct acpi_pptt_processor *cpu_node;
> + struct cacheinfo *this_leaf, *tleaf;
> + struct cpu_cacheinfo *this_cpu_ci = get_cpu_cacheinfo(cpu);
> + struct cacheinfo tmp_leaf = {0};
> + int index = 0;
> +
> + cpu_node = acpi_find_processor_node(table, get_acpi_id_for_cpu(cpu));
> + tleaf = &tmp_leaf;
> + tleaf->level = level;
> +
> + while (index < get_cpu_cacheinfo(cpu)->num_leaves) {
> + this_leaf = this_cpu_ci->info_list + index;
> + update_cache_properties(tleaf, cache,
> + ACPI_TO_POINTER(ACPI_PTR_DIFF(cpu_node, table)),
> + revision);
> + if (!memcmp(this_leaf, tleaf, sizeof(struct cacheinfo)))
> + return true;
> + index++;
> + }
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> +static bool cache_is_filled(struct acpi_pptt_cache *cache, struct acpi_table_header *table,
> + int cpu, int level)
> +{
> + u8 revision = table->revision;
> +
> + /*
> + * If revision >= 3, compare the cacheid directly,
> + * otherwise compare the entire contents of the cache.
> + */
> + if (revision >= 3)
> + return cache_is_filled_id(cache, cpu);
> + else
> + return cache_is_filled_content(cache, table, cpu, level, revision);
> +}
> +
> +void acpi_fill_cacheinfo(struct acpi_pptt_cache *cache,
> + struct acpi_table_header *table,
> + int cpu, int level, int *index)
> +{
> + struct cacheinfo *this_leaf;
> + struct acpi_pptt_processor *cpu_node;
> + struct cpu_cacheinfo *this_cpu_ci = get_cpu_cacheinfo(cpu);
> +
> + if (!index)
> + return;
> +
> + cpu_node = acpi_find_processor_node(table, get_acpi_id_for_cpu(cpu));
> + this_leaf = this_cpu_ci->info_list + *index;
> + if (this_leaf) {
> + this_leaf->level = level;
> + if (cache_is_filled(cache, table, cpu, level))
> + return;
> + update_cache_properties(this_leaf, cache,
> + ACPI_TO_POINTER(ACPI_PTR_DIFF(cpu_node,
> + table)),
> + table->revision);
> + *index += 1;
> + }
> +}
> +
> static void cache_setup_acpi_cpu(struct acpi_table_header *table,
> unsigned int cpu)
> {
> struct acpi_pptt_cache *found_cache;
> struct cpu_cacheinfo *this_cpu_ci = get_cpu_cacheinfo(cpu);
> u32 acpi_cpu_id = get_acpi_id_for_cpu(cpu);
> - struct cacheinfo *this_leaf;
> + struct cacheinfo *this_leaf = this_cpu_ci->info_list;
> unsigned int index = 0;
> struct acpi_pptt_processor *cpu_node = NULL;
>
> + if (!this_leaf->type && !this_leaf->level) {
> + acpi_find_cache_node(table, acpi_cpu_id, cpu, 0, 0, &cpu_node);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> while (index < get_cpu_cacheinfo(cpu)->num_leaves) {
> this_leaf = this_cpu_ci->info_list + index;
> - found_cache = acpi_find_cache_node(table, acpi_cpu_id,
> + found_cache = acpi_find_cache_node(table, acpi_cpu_id, cpu,
> this_leaf->type,
> this_leaf->level,
> &cpu_node);
> --
> 2.20.1
>
Thanks,
Yunhui
Powered by blists - more mailing lists