lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZhYCyuP6vTJq-TZq@kbusch-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 21:08:58 -0600
From: Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>
To: Holger Huo <holgerhuo@...look.com>
Cc: linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Holger Huo <i@...ger.one>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/nvme: Add quirks for device 1cc4:6a14

On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 10:05:46AM +0800, Holger Huo wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 10, 2024 4:14:42 AM +08 Keith Busch wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 03:28:50AM +0800, Holger Huo wrote:
> > > This commit adds NVME_QUIRK_BOGUS_NID for device [1cc4:6a14], the
> > > Shenzhen Unionmemory Information System Ltd. RPEYJ1T24MKN2QWY PCIe
> > > 4.0 NVMe SSD 1024GB (DRAM-less), which can be found on many Lenovo
> > > notebooks. This SSD produces all-zero nguid.
> > > 
> > > Other SSDs manufatured by Shenzhen Unionmemory Information System
> > > Ltd are likely to face similar issues, but I currently have no
> > > device to test.
> > 
> > Are you using the most recent stable kernel and still need this patch?
> > These quirks shouldn't be necessary anymore unless it's advertising
> > multipath capabilities, and it doesn't sound like this one should be
> > doing that.
> 
> Yes. My current Linux kernel version is 6.8.4 by arch. After further 
> investigation I found these quirks truly had no effects.
> But my nvme drive still freezes with Device not ready; aborting reset, 
> CSTS=0x1 failures and AMD-Vi: Event logged [IO_PAGE_FAULT domain=0x0001 ...] 
> waking from s0 (s2idle) sleep. Are there any other quirks or what that I 
> should try

I've seen the IO_PAGE_FAULT error reported before, but all I've heard is
that it means the device attempts to access a memory address that it is
not allowed to. I don't know why that would happen, though. I've never
first hand experience with this condition, I'm just as confused.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ