linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] scsi: ufs: Remove support for old UFSHCI versions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8b3fd7b3-3fad-4baf-8df5-55fe0fdc9438@acm.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 10:29:26 -0700
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@....com>,
 "James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
 "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc: "hch@...radead.org" <hch@...radead.org>, Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
 "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
 "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] scsi: ufs: Remove support for old UFSHCI versions

On 4/10/24 00:06, Avri Altman wrote:
> And the commit log say:
> To be extra cautious, leave out support for
> UFSHCI2.0 as well, and just remove support of host controllers prior
> to UFS2.0.
> 
> Isn't that clear enough?

In the description of this patch I see "leave out support for
UFSHCI2.0 as well". I read this as "leave out UFSHCI 2.0 support from
the driver". Apparently you meant "leave out removal of UFSHCI 2.0 
support from this patch"?

Thanks,

Bart.