linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v3 1/1] scsi: ufs: Remove support for old UFSHCI versions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 17:31:58 +0000
From: Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@....com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>, "James E . J . Bottomley"
	<jejb@...ux.ibm.com>, "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
CC: "hch@...radead.org" <hch@...radead.org>, Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
	"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 1/1] scsi: ufs: Remove support for old UFSHCI versions

> 
> On 4/10/24 00:06, Avri Altman wrote:
> > And the commit log say:
> > To be extra cautious, leave out support for
> > UFSHCI2.0 as well, and just remove support of host controllers prior
> > to UFS2.0.
> >
> > Isn't that clear enough?
> 
> In the description of this patch I see "leave out support for
> UFSHCI2.0 as well". I read this as "leave out UFSHCI 2.0 support from the
> driver". Apparently you meant "leave out removal of UFSHCI 2.0 support from
> this patch"?
Will fix.

Thanks,
Avri

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bart.