linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] dt-bindings: phy: qcom,ipq8074-qmp-pcie: add ipq9574 gen3x2 PHY

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2379377e-ca1c-453f-bb74-186ab738ce39@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 08:59:31 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: mr.nuke.me@...il.com, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
 Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
 Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] dt-bindings: phy: qcom,ipq8074-qmp-pcie: add
 ipq9574 gen3x2 PHY

On 09/04/2024 22:19, mr.nuke.me@...il.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>>   
>>>     clock-names:
>>>       items:
>>>         - const: aux
>>>         - const: cfg_ahb
>>>         - const: pipe
>>> +      - const: anoc
>>> +      - const: snoc
>>
>> OK, you did not test it. Neither this, nor DTS. I stop review, please
>> test first.
> 
> I ran both `checkpatch.pl` and `make dt_binding_check`. What in this 
> patch makes you say I "did not test it", and what test or tests did I miss?
> 

.. and no, you did not. If you tested, you would easily see error:
	clock-names: ['aux', 'cfg_ahb', 'pipe'] is too short

When you receive comment from reviewer, please investigate thoroughly
what could get wrong. Don't answer just to get rid of reviewer. It's
fine to make mistakes, but if reviewer points to issue and you
immediately respond "no issue", that's waste of my time.

Look at entire code of qcom,pcie how it is organized. Or:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.8/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml#L132


Best regards,
Krzysztof