linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] dt-bindings: phy: qcom,ipq8074-qmp-pcie: add ipq9574 gen3x2 PHY

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 09:02:32 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: mr.nuke.me@...il.com, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
 Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
 Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] dt-bindings: phy: qcom,ipq8074-qmp-pcie: add
 ipq9574 gen3x2 PHY

On 10/04/2024 08:59, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 09/04/2024 22:19, mr.nuke.me@...il.com wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>   
>>>>     clock-names:
>>>>       items:
>>>>         - const: aux
>>>>         - const: cfg_ahb
>>>>         - const: pipe
>>>> +      - const: anoc
>>>> +      - const: snoc
>>>
>>> OK, you did not test it. Neither this, nor DTS. I stop review, please
>>> test first.
>>
>> I ran both `checkpatch.pl` and `make dt_binding_check`. What in this 
>> patch makes you say I "did not test it", and what test or tests did I miss?
>>
> 
> ... and no, you did not. If you tested, you would easily see error:
> 	clock-names: ['aux', 'cfg_ahb', 'pipe'] is too short
> 
> When you receive comment from reviewer, please investigate thoroughly
> what could get wrong. Don't answer just to get rid of reviewer. It's
> fine to make mistakes, but if reviewer points to issue and you
> immediately respond "no issue", that's waste of my time.

To clarify: "no issue" response is waste of my time. If you responded
"oh, I see the error, but I don't know how to fix it", it would be ok, I
can clarify and help in this.

Best regards,
Krzysztof