[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cca972cc-8135-4037-9e4b-ac34dc600965@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 08:43:29 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@...111.site>, Dave Hansen
<dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, Michael Kelley <mhklinux@...look.com>,
Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] x86/mm: Don't disable INVLPG if "incomplete Global
INVLPG flushes" is fixed by microcode or the kernel is running in a
hypervisor
On 4/11/24 08:18, Dave Hansen wrote:
>
>> I'm not a native English speaker, so could you give some hint about how
>> to write this comment clearly?
> Something like this would be fine:
>
> /* Only bare-metal is affected. PCIDs in guests are OK. */
One more thing... Instead if cluttering up the main PCID setup path
that everybody has to read, you can put this in the macro:
#define INTEL_MATCH(_model) \
{ \
.vendor = X86_VENDOR_INTEL, \
.feature = X86_FEATURE_HYPERVISOR \
.family = 6, \
.model = _model, \
}
Then you can supplement the "INVLPG may not properly flush Global
entries..." comment.
/*
* INVLPG may not properly flush Global entries. But
* it only misbehaves when PCIDs are in use on bare
* metal on specific CPU models. It is completely
* fixed with updated microcode.
*/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists