lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 10:38:20 -0700
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>
CC: James Morse <james.morse@....com>, <x86@...nel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>, "Thomas
 Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, "Borislav
 Petkov" <bp@...en8.de>, H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>, Babu Moger
	<Babu.Moger@....com>, <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>, "D Scott
 Phillips OS" <scott@...amperecomputing.com>, <carl@...amperecomputing.com>,
	<lcherian@...vell.com>, <bobo.shaobowang@...wei.com>,
	<tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com>, <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>, Jamie Iles
	<quic_jiles@...cinc.com>, Xin Hao <xhao@...ux.alibaba.com>,
	<peternewman@...gle.com>, <dfustini@...libre.com>, <amitsinght@...vell.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, Rex Nie <rex.nie@...uarmicro.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 12/31] x86/resctrl: Move max_{name,data}_width into
 resctrl code

Hi Dave,

On 4/11/2024 7:15 AM, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 08:19:15PM -0700, Reinette Chatre wrote:
>> Hi James,
>>
>> On 3/21/2024 9:50 AM, James Morse wrote:
>>> @@ -2595,6 +2601,12 @@ static int schemata_list_add(struct rdt_resource *r, enum resctrl_conf_type type
>>>  	if (cl > max_name_width)
>>>  		max_name_width = cl;
>>>  
>>> +	/*
>>> +	 * Choose a width for the resource data based on the resource that has
>>> +	 * widest name and cbm.
>>
>> Please check series to ensure upper case is used for acronyms.
> 
> [...]
> 
>> Reinette
> 
> This patch is just moving existing code around AFAICT.  See:
> commit de016df88f23 ("x86/intel_rdt: Update schemata read to show data in tabular format")
> 
> Since no new usage of any term is being introduced here, can it be
> left as-is?
> 
> There seem to be other uses of "cbm" with this sense in the resctrl
> code already.

I am not asking to change all existing usages of these terms but in
any new changes, please use upper case for acronyms.

Reinette

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ