[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZheyJ5PORudx9gsK@matsya>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 15:19:27 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>,
Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
Sanyog Kale <sanyog.r.kale@...el.com>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] soundwire: qcom: allow multi-link on newer devices
On 05-04-24, 16:41, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Newer Qualcomm SoCs like X1E80100 might come with four speakers spread
> over two Soundwire controllers, thus they need a multi-link Soundwire
> stream runtime.
>
> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
> Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org
> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2:
> 1. Only rebase (slightly different context)
Applying /tmp/v2_20240405_krzysztof_kozlowski_soundwire_qcom_allow_multi_link_on_newer_devices.mbx
Applying: soundwire: qcom: allow multi-link on newer devices
error: drivers/soundwire/qcom.c: does not match index
Patch failed at 0001 soundwire: qcom: allow multi-link on newer devices
This fails as well :-(
> ---
> drivers/soundwire/qcom.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/qcom.c b/drivers/soundwire/qcom.c
> index fb70afe64fcc..ce5cf3ecceb5 100644
> --- a/drivers/soundwire/qcom.c
> +++ b/drivers/soundwire/qcom.c
> @@ -905,6 +905,18 @@ static int qcom_swrm_init(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int qcom_swrm_read_prop(struct sdw_bus *bus)
> +{
> + struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl = to_qcom_sdw(bus);
> +
> + if (ctrl->version >= SWRM_VERSION_2_0_0) {
> + bus->multi_link = true;
> + bus->hw_sync_min_links = 3;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static enum sdw_command_response qcom_swrm_xfer_msg(struct sdw_bus *bus,
> struct sdw_msg *msg)
> {
> @@ -1056,6 +1068,7 @@ static const struct sdw_master_port_ops qcom_swrm_port_ops = {
> };
>
> static const struct sdw_master_ops qcom_swrm_ops = {
> + .read_prop = qcom_swrm_read_prop,
> .xfer_msg = qcom_swrm_xfer_msg,
> .pre_bank_switch = qcom_swrm_pre_bank_switch,
> };
> @@ -1173,6 +1186,15 @@ static int qcom_swrm_stream_alloc_ports(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl,
>
> mutex_lock(&ctrl->port_lock);
> list_for_each_entry(m_rt, &stream->master_list, stream_node) {
> + /*
> + * For streams with multiple masters:
> + * Allocate ports only for devices connected to this master.
> + * Such devices will have ports allocated by their own master
> + * and its qcom_swrm_stream_alloc_ports() call.
> + */
> + if (ctrl->bus.id != m_rt->bus->id)
> + continue;
> +
> if (m_rt->direction == SDW_DATA_DIR_RX) {
> maxport = ctrl->num_dout_ports;
> port_mask = &ctrl->dout_port_mask;
> --
> 2.34.1
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists