linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] soundwire: qcom: allow multi-link on newer devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5cad6693-8a76-4a74-92a0-00a0818b5210@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 12:10:28 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>,
 Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
 Sanyog Kale <sanyog.r.kale@...el.com>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
 alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] soundwire: qcom: allow multi-link on newer devices

On 11/04/2024 11:49, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On 05-04-24, 16:41, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> Newer Qualcomm SoCs like X1E80100 might come with four speakers spread
>> over two Soundwire controllers, thus they need a multi-link Soundwire
>> stream runtime.
>>
>> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
>> Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org
>> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>> 1. Only rebase (slightly different context)
> 
> Applying /tmp/v2_20240405_krzysztof_kozlowski_soundwire_qcom_allow_multi_link_on_newer_devices.mbx
> Applying: soundwire: qcom: allow multi-link on newer devices
> error: drivers/soundwire/qcom.c: does not match index
> Patch failed at 0001 soundwire: qcom: allow multi-link on newer devices
> 
> This fails as well :-(

I just applied it on v6.9-rc3 and next-20240410 with b4. No problems.

Did anything change since yesterday next? Can you point me to the tree
and branch you are using?

Best regards,
Krzysztof