[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <D0H9F200BT16.2HWU1I45AS1S7@fairphone.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 13:33:59 +0200
From: "Luca Weiss" <luca.weiss@...rphone.com>
To: "Dmitry Baryshkov" <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>, "Bjorn Andersson"
<andersson@...nel.org>, "Michael Turquette" <mturquette@...libre.com>,
"Stephen Boyd" <sboyd@...nel.org>, "Konrad Dybcio"
<konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>, "Konrad Dybcio" <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
"Neil Armstrong" <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>
Cc: <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] clk: qcom: dispcc-sm6350: fix DisplayPort clocks
On Mon Apr 8, 2024 at 1:47 PM CEST, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On SM6350 DisplayPort link clocks use frequency tables inherited from
> the vendor kernel, it is not applicable in the upstream kernel. Drop
> frequency tables and use clk_byte2_ops for those clocks.
>
> Fixes: 837519775f1d ("clk: qcom: Add display clock controller driver for SM6350")
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Appears to fix this non-critical error when enabling DisplayPort.
msm-dp-display ae90000.displayport-controller: _opp_config_clk_single: failed to set clock rate: -22
And DisplayPort (over USB-C) continues to work as expected, thanks!
Tested-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@...rphone.com>
For completeness, I wrote something about this also on #linux-msm IRC on
March 22nd.
> Hi, I'm trying to get displayport to work on sm6350 but hitting a
> weird issue regarding link clk frequency. For the requested link
> rate=540000 in dp_ctrl_enable_mainlink_clocks we call
> dev_pm_opp_set_rate with target_freq=540000000 (clk name:
> disp_cc_mdss_dp_link_clk) but the clk_round_rate there makes this into
> freq=810000 and subsequently qmp_dp_link_clk_determine_rate fails
> because that's not a valid frequency, only for example 810000000.
> Without any debug statements the visible error in kernel log is:
> "msm-dp-display ae90000.displayport-controller:
> _opp_config_clk_single: failed to set clock rate: -22"
>
> So somewhere there seems to be confusion between how many zeroes
> should be where.. But not sure how this is working on other SoCs, I
> don't see anything much different for my SoC
>
> Kernel base is 6.8.1 fwiw
>
> clk_round_rate behavior feels correct as
> ftbl_disp_cc_mdss_dp_link_clk_src lists the frequencies as
> 162000/270000/540000/810000 so it rounds it to the highest available
> frequency of the clock
Regards
Luca
> ---
> drivers/clk/qcom/dispcc-sm6350.c | 11 +----------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/dispcc-sm6350.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/dispcc-sm6350.c
> index 839435362010..e4b7464c4d0e 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/dispcc-sm6350.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/dispcc-sm6350.c
> @@ -221,26 +221,17 @@ static struct clk_rcg2 disp_cc_mdss_dp_crypto_clk_src = {
> },
> };
>
> -static const struct freq_tbl ftbl_disp_cc_mdss_dp_link_clk_src[] = {
> - F(162000, P_DP_PHY_PLL_LINK_CLK, 1, 0, 0),
> - F(270000, P_DP_PHY_PLL_LINK_CLK, 1, 0, 0),
> - F(540000, P_DP_PHY_PLL_LINK_CLK, 1, 0, 0),
> - F(810000, P_DP_PHY_PLL_LINK_CLK, 1, 0, 0),
> - { }
> -};
> -
> static struct clk_rcg2 disp_cc_mdss_dp_link_clk_src = {
> .cmd_rcgr = 0x10f8,
> .mnd_width = 0,
> .hid_width = 5,
> .parent_map = disp_cc_parent_map_0,
> - .freq_tbl = ftbl_disp_cc_mdss_dp_link_clk_src,
> .clkr.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
> .name = "disp_cc_mdss_dp_link_clk_src",
> .parent_data = disp_cc_parent_data_0,
> .num_parents = ARRAY_SIZE(disp_cc_parent_data_0),
> .flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE,
> - .ops = &clk_rcg2_ops,
> + .ops = &clk_byte2_ops,
> },
> };
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists