[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <40b32537-b2c3-450a-866a-82cf4686057a@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 20:38:57 +0800
From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
Cc: baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>, Tina Zhang <tina.zhang@...el.com>,
Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@...el.com>, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] iommu/vt-d: Add cache tag assignment interface
On 2024/4/10 23:41, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>> +struct cache_tag {
>> + struct list_head node;
>> + enum cache_tag_type type;
>> + struct intel_iommu *iommu;
>> + struct device *dev;
> iommu and dev probably don't both need to be stored together. We have
> iommu_get_iommu_dev() now.. I suppose this is probably a union of the
> two pointers depending on tag. DEVTLB needs the dev and IOTLB needs
> the iommu.
I forgot to reply this comment in previous reply. Sorry about it.
struct cache_tag {
[ ... ]
struct intel_iommu *iommu;
struct device *dev;
[ ... ]
};
I treat @iommu as the queued invalidation interface. All cache
invalidation raises to hardware through the invalidation queue.
The @dev field represents the location of the cache. For IOTLB cache, it
resides on the IOMMU hardware. In this case, the field stores the device
pointer to the IOMMU hardware. For DevTLB cache, it locates in the PCIe
endpoint. Here, the field stores the device pointer to that endpoint.
A correctly set @dev pointer allows users to see more accurate trace
message.
Best regards,
baolu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists