[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240411123917.GA2180141@bhelgaas>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 07:39:17 -0500
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@...il.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>, Sven Peter <sven@...npeter.dev>,
Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@...enzweig.io>,
Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>, Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@...il.com>,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@...nel.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Srikanth Thokala <srikanth.thokala@...el.com>,
Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@...iatek.com>,
Jianjun Wang <jianjun.wang@...iatek.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Daire McNamara <daire.mcnamara@...rochip.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@...il.com>,
Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@...opsys.com>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharat.kumar.gogada@....com>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Mark Kettenis <kettenis@...nbsd.org>,
Tom Joseph <tjoseph@...ence.com>,
Ahmad Zainie <wan.ahmad.zainie.wan.mohamad@...el.com>,
Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
Thippeswamy Havalige <thippeswamy.havalige@....com>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, asahi@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] dt-bindings: PCI: mediatek,mt7621: add missing
child node reg
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 08:13:18AM +0200, Sergio Paracuellos wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 8:01 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
> > On 10/04/2024 23:26, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 08:15:19PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > >> MT7621 PCI host bridge has children which apparently are also PCI host
> > >> bridges, at least that's what the binding suggest.
> > >
> > > What does it even mean for a PCI host bridge to have a child that is
> > > also a PCI host bridge?
> > >
> > > Does this mean a driver binds to the "parent" host bridge, enumerates
> > > the PCI devices below it, and finds a "child" host bridge?
>
> Yes, that is exactly what you can see on enumeration.
>
> The following is a typical boot trace where all bridges has a device also below:
>
> mt7621-pci 1e140000.pcie: host bridge /pcie@...40000 ranges:
> mt7621-pci 1e140000.pcie: No bus range found for /pcie@...40000, using [bus 00-ff]
> mt7621-pci 1e140000.pcie: MEM 0x0060000000..0x006fffffff -> 0x0060000000
> mt7621-pci 1e140000.pcie: IO 0x001e160000..0x001e16ffff -> 0x0000000000
> mt7621-pci 1e140000.pcie: PCIE0 enabled
> mt7621-pci 1e140000.pcie: PCIE1 enabled
> mt7621-pci 1e140000.pcie: PCIE2 enabled
> mt7621-pci 1e140000.pcie: PCI host bridge to bus 0000:00
1e140000.pcie is a host bridge. It has some CPU-specific bus on the
upstream side, standard PCI (domain 0000, buses 00-ff) on the
downstream side.
> pci 0000:00:00.0: [0e8d:0801] type 01 class 0x060400
> pci 0000:00:01.0: [0e8d:0801] type 01 class 0x060400
> pci 0000:00:02.0: [0e8d:0801] type 01 class 0x060400
> pci 0000:01:00.0: [1b21:0611] type 00 class 0x010185
> pci 0000:00:00.0: PCI bridge to [bus 01-ff]
> pci 0000:00:00.0: bridge window [io 0x0000-0x0fff]
> pci 0000:00:00.0: bridge window [mem 0x00000000-0x000fffff]
> pci 0000:00:00.0: bridge window [mem 0x00000000-0x000fffff pref]
00:00.0 looks like a PCIe Root Port to bus 01. This is not a host
bridge; it's just a standard PCI-to-PCI bridge with PCI on both the
upstream and downstream sides.
> pci 0000:02:00.0: [1b21:0611] type 00 class 0x010185
> pci 0000:00:01.0: PCI bridge to [bus 02-ff]
> pci 0000:00:01.0: bridge window [io 0x0000-0x0fff]
> pci 0000:00:01.0: bridge window [mem 0x00000000-0x000fffff]
> pci 0000:00:01.0: bridge window [mem 0x00000000-0x000fffff pref]
00:01.0 is another Root Port to bus 02.
> pci 0000:03:00.0: [1b21:0611] type 00 class 0x010185
> pci 0000:00:02.0: PCI bridge to [bus 03-ff]
> pci 0000:00:02.0: bridge window [io 0x0000-0x0fff]
> pci 0000:00:02.0: bridge window [mem 0x00000000-0x000fffff]
> pci 0000:00:02.0: bridge window [mem 0x00000000-0x000fffff pref]
> pci_bus 0000:03: busn_res: [bus 03-ff] end is updated to 03
And 00:02.0 is a third Root Port to bus 03.
> pci 0000:00:00.0: PCI bridge to [bus 01]
> pci 0000:00:00.0: bridge window [io 0x0000-0x0fff]
> pci 0000:00:00.0: bridge window [mem 0x60000000-0x600fffff]
> pci 0000:00:00.0: bridge window [mem 0x60100000-0x601fffff pref]
> pci 0000:00:01.0: PCI bridge to [bus 02]
> pci 0000:00:01.0: bridge window [io 0x1000-0x1fff]
> pci 0000:00:01.0: bridge window [mem 0x60200000-0x602fffff]
> pci 0000:00:01.0: bridge window [mem 0x60300000-0x603fffff pref]
> pci 0000:00:02.0: PCI bridge to [bus 03]
> pci 0000:00:02.0: bridge window [io 0x2000-0x2fff]
> pci 0000:00:02.0: bridge window [mem 0x60400000-0x604fffff]
>
> > I think the question should be towards Mediatek folks. I don't know what
> > this hardware is exactly, just looks like pci-pci-bridge. The driver
> > calls the children host bridges as "ports".
>
> You can see the topology here in my first driver submit cover letter
> message [0].
>
> [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAMhs-H-BA+KzEwuDPzcmrDPdgJBFA2XdYTBvT4R4MEOUB=WQ1g@mail.gmail.com/t/
Nothing unusual here, this looks like the standard PCIe topology.
What *might* be unusual is describing the Root Ports in DT. Since
they are standard PCI devices, they shouldn't need DT description
unless there's some unusual power/clock/reset control or something
that is not discoverable via PCI enumeration.
Bjorn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists