lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <633c4f8c-c22c-4128-b478-0627da8660bd@quicinc.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 12:04:21 +0800
From: Fenglin Wu <quic_fenglinw@...cinc.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
CC: <kernel@...cinc.com>, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson
	<andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        "Dmitry
 Torokhov" <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 4/4] input: pm8xxx-vibrator: add new SPMI vibrator
 support



On 4/11/2024 10:21 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 at 16:51, Fenglin Wu <quic_fenglinw@...cinc.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2024/4/11 19:02, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 at 11:32, Fenglin Wu via B4 Relay
>>> <devnull+quic_fenglinw.quicinc.com@...nel.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> From: Fenglin Wu <quic_fenglinw@...cinc.com>
>>>>
>>>> Add support for a new SPMI vibrator module which is very similar
>>>> to the vibrator module inside PM8916 but has a finer drive voltage
>>>> step and different output voltage range, its drive level control
>>>> is expanded across 2 registers. The vibrator module can be found
>>>> in following Qualcomm PMICs: PMI632, PM7250B, PM7325B, PM7550BA.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Fenglin Wu <quic_fenglinw@...cinc.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    drivers/input/misc/pm8xxx-vibrator.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>>>>    1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/pm8xxx-vibrator.c b/drivers/input/misc/pm8xxx-vibrator.c
>>>> index 2959edca8eb9..35bb6f450fd2 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/input/misc/pm8xxx-vibrator.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/input/misc/pm8xxx-vibrator.c
>>>> @@ -12,10 +12,10 @@
>>>>    #include <linux/regmap.h>
>>>>    #include <linux/slab.h>
>>>>
>>>> -#define VIB_MAX_LEVEL_mV       (3100)
>>>> -#define VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV       (1200)
>>>> -#define VIB_PER_STEP_mV        (100)
>>>> -#define VIB_MAX_LEVELS         (VIB_MAX_LEVEL_mV - VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV + VIB_PER_STEP_mV)
>>>> +#define VIB_MAX_LEVEL_mV(vib)  (vib->drv2_addr ? 3544 : 3100)
>>>> +#define VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV(vib)  (vib->drv2_addr ? 1504 : 1200)
>>>> +#define VIB_PER_STEP_mV(vib)   (vib->drv2_addr ? 8 : 100)
>>>> +#define VIB_MAX_LEVELS(vib)    (VIB_MAX_LEVEL_mV(vib) - VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV(vib) + VIB_PER_STEP_mV(vib))
>>>>
>>>>    #define MAX_FF_SPEED           0xff
>>>>
>>>> @@ -26,6 +26,9 @@ struct pm8xxx_regs {
>>>>           unsigned int drv_offset;
>>>>           unsigned int drv_mask;
>>>>           unsigned int drv_shift;
>>>> +       unsigned int drv2_offset;
>>>> +       unsigned int drv2_mask;
>>>> +       unsigned int drv2_shift;
>>>>           unsigned int drv_en_manual_mask;
>>>>    };
>>>>
>>>> @@ -45,6 +48,18 @@ static struct pm8xxx_regs pm8916_regs = {
>>>>           .drv_en_manual_mask = 0,
>>>>    };
>>>>
>>>> +static struct pm8xxx_regs pmi632_regs = {
>>>> +       .enable_offset = 0x46,
>>>> +       .enable_mask = BIT(7),
>>>> +       .drv_offset = 0x40,
>>>> +       .drv_mask = GENMASK(7, 0),
>>>> +       .drv_shift = 0,
>>>> +       .drv2_offset = 0x41,
>>>> +       .drv2_mask = GENMASK(3, 0),
>>>> +       .drv2_shift = 8,
>>>> +       .drv_en_manual_mask = 0,
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>>    /**
>>>>     * struct pm8xxx_vib - structure to hold vibrator data
>>>>     * @vib_input_dev: input device supporting force feedback
>>>> @@ -53,6 +68,7 @@ static struct pm8xxx_regs pm8916_regs = {
>>>>     * @regs: registers' info
>>>>     * @enable_addr: vibrator enable register
>>>>     * @drv_addr: vibrator drive strength register
>>>> + * @drv2_addr: vibrator drive strength upper byte register
>>>>     * @speed: speed of vibration set from userland
>>>>     * @active: state of vibrator
>>>>     * @level: level of vibration to set in the chip
>>>> @@ -65,6 +81,7 @@ struct pm8xxx_vib {
>>>>           const struct pm8xxx_regs *regs;
>>>>           unsigned int enable_addr;
>>>>           unsigned int drv_addr;
>>>> +       unsigned int drv2_addr;
>>>>           int speed;
>>>>           int level;
>>>>           bool active;
>>>> @@ -82,6 +99,10 @@ static int pm8xxx_vib_set(struct pm8xxx_vib *vib, bool on)
>>>>           unsigned int val = vib->reg_vib_drv;
>>>>           const struct pm8xxx_regs *regs = vib->regs;
>>>>
>>>> +       /* vibrator without drv2_addr needs be programmed in step increments */
>>>
>>> How are these two items related? Are you using vib->drv2_addr as a
>>> marker for 'particular generation'? In such a case please use a flag
>>> instead.
>>>
>>> The rest looks good to me.
>>>
>> Are you suggesting to add a flag in pm8xxx_vib as a discriminator for
>> the new generation? I actually tried to avoid that because of this comment:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/ZgXSBiQcBEbwF060@google.com/#t
> 
> Add a flag for level being programmed in steps or in mV. Using
> drv2_addr instead of such flag is a hack.
> 
Thanks Dmitry.
Does this flag look good to you?

diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/pm8xxx-vibrator.c 
b/drivers/input/misc/pm8xxx-vibrator.c
index 35bb6f450fd2..4708f441e5ac 100644
--- a/drivers/input/misc/pm8xxx-vibrator.c
+++ b/drivers/input/misc/pm8xxx-vibrator.c
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ struct pm8xxx_regs {
         unsigned int drv2_mask;
         unsigned int drv2_shift;
         unsigned int drv_en_manual_mask;
+       bool         drv_in_step;
  };

  static const struct pm8xxx_regs pm8058_regs = {
@@ -37,6 +38,7 @@ static const struct pm8xxx_regs pm8058_regs = {
         .drv_mask = 0xf8,
         .drv_shift = 3,
         .drv_en_manual_mask = 0xfc,
+       .drv_in_step = true;
  };

  static struct pm8xxx_regs pm8916_regs = {
@@ -46,6 +48,7 @@ static struct pm8xxx_regs pm8916_regs = {
         .drv_mask = 0x1F,
         .drv_shift = 0,
         .drv_en_manual_mask = 0,
+       .drv_in_step = true;
  };

  static struct pm8xxx_regs pmi632_regs = {
@@ -58,6 +61,7 @@ static struct pm8xxx_regs pmi632_regs = {
         .drv2_mask = GENMASK(3, 0),
         .drv2_shift = 8,
         .drv_en_manual_mask = 0,
+       .drv_in_step = false,
  };

  /**
@@ -100,7 +104,7 @@ static int pm8xxx_vib_set(struct pm8xxx_vib *vib, 
bool on)
         const struct pm8xxx_regs *regs = vib->regs;

         /* vibrator without drv2_addr needs be programmed in step 
increments */
-       if (!vib->drv2_addr)
+       if (regs->drv_in_step)
                 vib->level /= VIB_PER_STEP_mV(vib);

         if (on)


>>
>>>> +       if (!vib->drv2_addr)
>>>> +               vib->level /= VIB_PER_STEP_mV(vib);
>>>> +
>>>>           if (on)
>>>>                   val |= (vib->level << regs->drv_shift) & regs->drv_mask;
>>>>           else
>>>> @@ -93,6 +114,17 @@ static int pm8xxx_vib_set(struct pm8xxx_vib *vib, bool on)
>>>>
>>>>           vib->reg_vib_drv = val;
>>>>
>>>> +       if (regs->drv2_mask) {
>>>> +               if (on)
>>>> +                       val = (vib->level << regs->drv2_shift) & regs->drv2_mask;
>>>> +               else
>>>> +                       val = 0;
>>>> +
>>>> +               rc = regmap_write_bits(vib->regmap, vib->drv2_addr, regs->drv2_mask, val);
>>>> +               if (rc < 0)
>>>> +                       return rc;
>>>> +       }
>>>> +
>>>>           if (regs->enable_mask)
>>>>                   rc = regmap_update_bits(vib->regmap, vib->enable_addr,
>>>>                                           regs->enable_mask, on ? regs->enable_mask : 0);
>>>> @@ -115,17 +147,16 @@ static void pm8xxx_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
>>>>                   return;
>>>>
>>>>           /*
>>>> -        * pmic vibrator supports voltage ranges from 1.2 to 3.1V, so
>>>> +        * pmic vibrator supports voltage ranges from MIN_LEVEL to MAX_LEVEL, so
>>>>            * scale the level to fit into these ranges.
>>>>            */
>>>>           if (vib->speed) {
>>>>                   vib->active = true;
>>>> -               vib->level = ((VIB_MAX_LEVELS * vib->speed) / MAX_FF_SPEED) +
>>>> -                                               VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV;
>>>> -               vib->level /= VIB_PER_STEP_mV;
>>>> +               vib->level = VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV(vib);
>>>> +               vib->level += mult_frac(VIB_MAX_LEVELS(vib), vib->speed, MAX_FF_SPEED);
>>>>           } else {
>>>>                   vib->active = false;
>>>> -               vib->level = VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV / VIB_PER_STEP_mV;
>>>> +               vib->level = VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV(vib);
>>>>           }
>>>>
>>>>           pm8xxx_vib_set(vib, vib->active);
>>>> @@ -203,6 +234,7 @@ static int pm8xxx_vib_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>>
>>>>           vib->enable_addr = reg_base + regs->enable_offset;
>>>>           vib->drv_addr = reg_base + regs->drv_offset;
>>>> +       vib->drv2_addr = reg_base + regs->drv2_offset;
>>>>
>>>>           /* operate in manual mode */
>>>>           error = regmap_read(vib->regmap, vib->drv_addr, &val);
>>>> @@ -257,6 +289,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id pm8xxx_vib_id_table[] = {
>>>>           { .compatible = "qcom,pm8058-vib", .data = &pm8058_regs },
>>>>           { .compatible = "qcom,pm8921-vib", .data = &pm8058_regs },
>>>>           { .compatible = "qcom,pm8916-vib", .data = &pm8916_regs },
>>>> +       { .compatible = "qcom,pmi632-vib", .data = &pmi632_regs },
>>>>           { }
>>>>    };
>>>>    MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, pm8xxx_vib_id_table);
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> 2.25.1
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
> 
> 
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ