[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <xfaf22rf6gnrxpinkciybsyk4dx2bfqgozv6udwymegtcgd26i@jq5be7fm5lhi>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:49:35 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: Provide !COMMON_CLK dummy for
devm_clk_rate_exclusive_get()
Hello Stephen,
On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 03:35:57PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Uwe Kleine-König (2024-03-27 00:33:10)
> > To be able to compile drivers using devm_clk_rate_exclusive_get() also
> > on platforms without the common clk framework, add a dummy
> > implementation that does the same as clk_rate_exclusive_get() in that
> > case (i.e. nothing).
> >
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202403270305.ydvX9xq1-lkp@intel.com/
> > Fixes: b0cde62e4c54 ("clk: Add a devm variant of clk_rate_exclusive_get()")
> > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
> > ---
>
> Applied to clk-fixes
I assume that means it will be sent to Linus before 6.9? That would be
great because I want to make use of this function in some drivers and
the build bots nag about my for-next branch that in some configurations
this function is missing.
Thanks
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists