linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] clk: Provide !COMMON_CLK dummy for devm_clk_rate_exclusive

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <y7i7vwl7h2xop2ifh72vj5brtq7vd7tf72tst7k7r74plguhgn@cqs5fzplfk5i>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 22:00:19 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>, 
	kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: Provide !COMMON_CLK dummy for
 devm_clk_rate_exclusive_get()

Hello Stephen,

On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 10:49:35PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 03:35:57PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Uwe Kleine-König (2024-03-27 00:33:10)
> > > To be able to compile drivers using devm_clk_rate_exclusive_get() also
> > > on platforms without the common clk framework, add a dummy
> > > implementation that does the same as clk_rate_exclusive_get() in that
> > > case (i.e. nothing).
> > > 
> > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> > > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202403270305.ydvX9xq1-lkp@intel.com/
> > > Fixes: b0cde62e4c54 ("clk: Add a devm variant of clk_rate_exclusive_get()")
> > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
> > > ---
> > 
> > Applied to clk-fixes
> 
> I assume that means it will be sent to Linus before 6.9? That would be
> great because I want to make use of this function in some drivers and
> the build bots nag about my for-next branch that in some configurations
> this function is missing.

Gentle ping. I'd like to get the patches I intend to send to Linus for
v6.10-rc1 into shape. To have these unmodified in my for-next branch for
some time it would be great to know your plans for the clk-fixes branch. 
Alternatively: Can I expect the commit not to be changed any more and
pull it into my pwm tree?

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)