linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net] octeontx2-pf: fix FLOW_DIS_IS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 11:18:59 +0000
From: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <ast@...erby.net>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 Sunil Kovvuri Goutham <sgoutham@...vell.com>,
 Geethasowjanya Akula <gakula@...vell.com>,
 Subbaraya Sundeep Bhatta <sbhatta@...vell.com>,
 Hariprasad Kelam <hkelam@...vell.com>, Suman Ghosh <sumang@...vell.com>,
 "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] octeontx2-pf: fix FLOW_DIS_IS_FRAGMENT implementation

Hi maintainers,

On 4/12/24 10:25 AM, Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen wrote:
> On 4/12/24 9:01 AM, Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen wrote:
> I was a bit in a hurry, to get the reply in before a meeting,
> so: s/FLOW_DIS_FIRST_FRAG/FLOW_DIS_IS_FRAGMENT/g

It was just a fix for my reply to Suman, so I am a bit confused
why the patch itself got marked as "Changes Requested" in patchwork [1].

I can spin a v2, but the only change would currently be Jacob Keller's Reviewed-by.

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20240410134303.21560-1-ast@fiberby.net/

-- 
Best regards
Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen
Network Engineer
Fiberby - AS42541