lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 11:52:44 +0000
From: Sunil Kovvuri Goutham <sgoutham@...vell.com>
To: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <ast@...erby.net>,
        "David S.
 Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Eric Dumazet
	<edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Geethasowjanya Akula <gakula@...vell.com>,
        Subbaraya Sundeep Bhatta
	<sbhatta@...vell.com>,
        Hariprasad Kelam <hkelam@...vell.com>,
        Suman Ghosh
	<sumang@...vell.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] octeontx2-pf: fix FLOW_DIS_IS_FRAGMENT implementation



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <ast@...erby.net>
> Sent: Friday, April 12, 2024 4:49 PM
> To: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>; Paolo Abeni
> <pabeni@...hat.com>; Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>; Jakub
> Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Sunil Kovvuri Goutham
> <sgoutham@...vell.com>; Geethasowjanya Akula <gakula@...vell.com>;
> Subbaraya Sundeep Bhatta <sbhatta@...vell.com>; Hariprasad Kelam
> <hkelam@...vell.com>; Suman Ghosh <sumang@...vell.com>;
> netdev@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net] octeontx2-pf: fix
> FLOW_DIS_IS_FRAGMENT implementation
 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Hi maintainers,
> 
> On 4/12/24 10:25 AM, Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen wrote:
> > On 4/12/24 9:01 AM, Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen wrote:
> > I was a bit in a hurry, to get the reply in before a meeting,
> > so: s/FLOW_DIS_FIRST_FRAG/FLOW_DIS_IS_FRAGMENT/g
> 
> It was just a fix for my reply to Suman, so I am a bit confused why the patch
> itself got marked as "Changes Requested" in patchwork [1].
> 
> I can spin a v2, but the only change would currently be Jacob Keller's
> Reviewed-by.
> 

Patch looks okay to us.
Please submit a v2, meanwhile we will test once and give a tested-by as well.

Thanks,
Sunil.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ