linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] clk: samsung: introduce nMUX to reparent MUX clocks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ab700927-d7b6-44c6-bbe0-8c52e4a0f907@linaro.org>
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2024 10:47:24 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>, peter.griffin@...aro.org
Cc: alim.akhtar@...sung.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 andre.draszik@...aro.org, willmcvicker@...gle.com, kernel-team@...roid.com,
 s.nawrocki@...sung.com, cw00.choi@...sung.com, mturquette@...libre.com,
 sboyd@...nel.org, semen.protsenko@...aro.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
 jaewon02.kim@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] clk: samsung: introduce nMUX to reparent MUX
 clocks

On 28/03/2024 13:34, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
> v3:
> - update first patch:
>   - remove __nMUX() as it duplicated __MUX() with an exception on flags.
>   - update commit message
>   - update comment and say that nMUX() shall be used where MUX reparenting
>     on clock rate chage is allowed
> - collect R-b, A-b tags
> 

Sorry for late response, somehow this end up deep in inbox. You
reference some non existing commits, so I think you do not work on
mainline trees.

Also Fixes must come before other patches, so probably first patch
should be squashed with second. Otherwise second patch is not a complete
fix.

Best regards,
Krzysztof