linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 00/38] ep93xx device tree conversion

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2024 10:48:17 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@...uefel.me>, 
	Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@...ionengravers.com>, Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...il.com>, 
	Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, Lukasz Majewski <lukma@...x.de>, 
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, 
	Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, 
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>, 
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, 
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, 
	Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, 
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, 
	"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, 
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, 
	Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>, Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, 
	Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>, Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@...nel.org>, 
	Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>, 
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, 
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>, Aaron Wu <Aaron.Wu@...log.com>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, 
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Niklas Cassel <cassel@...nel.org>, 
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, 
	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>, 
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/38] ep93xx device tree conversion

Hello Arnd,

On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 11:07:06AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2024, at 10:18, Nikita Shubin via B4 Relay wrote:
> > The goal is to recieve ACKs for all patches in series to merge it via 
> > Arnd branch.
> 
> Thank you for the continued updates, I really hope we can merge
> it all for 6.10. I've looked through it again and I'm pretty much
> ready to just merge it, though I admit that the process is not
> working out that great, and it would probably have been quicker
> to add DT support to drivers individually through the subsystem
> trees.
> 
> > Stephen Boyd, Vinod Koul PLEASE! give some comments on following, couse 
> > i hadn't one for a couple of iterations already:
> >
> > Following patches require attention from Stephen Boyd, as they were 
> > converted to aux_dev as suggested:
> >
> > - ARM: ep93xx: add regmap aux_dev
> > - clk: ep93xx: add DT support for Cirrus EP93xx
> >
> > Following patches require attention from Vinod Koul:
> >
> > - dma: cirrus: Convert to DT for Cirrus EP93xx
> > - dma: cirrus: remove platform code
> 
> I suspect that Stephen and Vinod may be missing this, as reviewing
> a 38 patch series tends to be a lot of work, and they may have
> missed that they are on the critical path here. I certainly
> tend to just ignore an entire thread when it looks like I'm not
> immediately going to be reviewing it all and other people are
> likely to have more comments first, so I'm not blaming them.
> 
> To better catch their attention, I would suggest you repost the
> two smaller sets of patches as a separate series, with only the
> relevant people on Cc. Please also include the respective
> bindings when you send send these patches to Stephen and
> Vinod.

It seems this happend for the clock series; it's at
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240408-ep93xx-clk-v1-0-1d0f4c324647@maquefel.me/
and received an ack by Stephen.

Vinod gave some feedback in this thread with some remarks that need
addressing.

With the latter I wonder if the plan to get this as a whole into v6.10
is screwed and if I should pick up the PWM bits (patches #12, #13 and
maybe #38) via my tree. Patch #38 touches arch/arm and
include/linux/soc, so I wouldn't pick that one up without an explicit
ack by (I guess) Arnd.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)