[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZhpfwaIUc0HpfZP1@wunner.de>
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2024 12:34:41 +0200
From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: "M. Haener" <michael.haener@...mens.com>,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...mens.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: tpm: Add st,st33ktpm2xi2c to TCG TIS
binding
On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 12:23:47PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 13/04/2024 12:18, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 10:10:49AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > I got only one patch, but if these are compatible, why do you need
> > > second patch? Plus binding come before users.
> >
> > Right, the order of the patches needs to be reversed it seems.
>
> What is the second patch? Device is or is not compatible?
The other patch just adds an entry to of_tis_i2c_match[] in the driver,
pretty unspectacular:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240413071621.12509-2-michael.haener@siemens.com/
Unfortunately it was only cc'ed to TPM driver maintainers.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists