linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: tpm: Add st,st33ktpm2xi2c to TCG TIS binding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2024 12:43:38 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
Cc: "M. Haener" <michael.haener@...mens.com>,
 linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>, Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
 Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...mens.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: tpm: Add st,st33ktpm2xi2c to TCG TIS
 binding

On 13/04/2024 12:34, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 12:23:47PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 13/04/2024 12:18, Lukas Wunner wrote:
>>> On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 10:10:49AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> I got only one patch, but if these are compatible, why do you need
>>>> second patch? Plus binding come before users.
>>>
>>> Right, the order of the patches needs to be reversed it seems.
>>
>> What is the second patch? Device is or is not compatible?
> 
> The other patch just adds an entry to of_tis_i2c_match[] in the driver,
> pretty unspectacular:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240413071621.12509-2-michael.haener@siemens.com/
> 

Then why is it needed?

To re-iterate:
"Device is or is not compatible?"

Decide, one of the two patches is wrong.

Best regards,
Krzysztof