| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <889ca65c-c9c7-4658-9c34-5d89774218cc@linaro.org> Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2024 12:43:38 +0200 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> To: Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de> Cc: "M. Haener" <michael.haener@...mens.com>, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>, Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...mens.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: tpm: Add st,st33ktpm2xi2c to TCG TIS binding On 13/04/2024 12:34, Lukas Wunner wrote: > On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 12:23:47PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 13/04/2024 12:18, Lukas Wunner wrote: >>> On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 10:10:49AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>> I got only one patch, but if these are compatible, why do you need >>>> second patch? Plus binding come before users. >>> >>> Right, the order of the patches needs to be reversed it seems. >> >> What is the second patch? Device is or is not compatible? > > The other patch just adds an entry to of_tis_i2c_match[] in the driver, > pretty unspectacular: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240413071621.12509-2-michael.haener@siemens.com/ > Then why is it needed? To re-iterate: "Device is or is not compatible?" Decide, one of the two patches is wrong. Best regards, Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists