linux-kernel - [PATCH] sched/isolation: fix boot crash when maxcpus

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240413141746.GA10008@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2024 16:17:46 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
	Leonardo Bras <leobras@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Junyao Zhao <junzhao@...hat.com>,
	Chris von Recklinghausen <crecklin@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] sched/isolation: fix boot crash when maxcpus <
 first-housekeeping-cpu

housekeeping_setup() checks cpumask_intersects(present, online) to ensure
that the kernel will have at least one housekeeping CPU after smp_init(),
but this doesn't work if the maxcpus= kernel parameter limits the number
of processors available after bootup.

For example, the kernel with "maxcpus=2 nohz_full=0-2" parameters crashes
at boot time on my virtual machine with 4 CPUs.

Change housekeeping_setup() to use cpumask_first_and() and check that the
returned cpu number is valid and less than setup_max_cpus.

Another corner case is "nohz_full=0" on a machine with a single CPU or
with the maxcpus=1 kernel argument. In this case non_housekeeping_mask
is empty and IIUC tick_nohz_full_setup() makes no sense. And indeed, the
kernel hits the WARN_ON(tick_nohz_full_running) in tick_sched_do_timer().

And how should the kernel interpret the "nohz_full=" parameter? I think
it should be silently ignored, but currently cpulist_parse() happily
returns the empty cpumask and this leads to the same problem.

Change housekeeping_setup() to check cpumask_empty(non_housekeeping_mask)
and do nothing in this case.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
---
 kernel/sched/isolation.c | 7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/isolation.c b/kernel/sched/isolation.c
index 2a262d3ecb3d..5891e715f00d 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/isolation.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/isolation.c
@@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ static void __init housekeeping_setup_type(enum hk_type type,
 static int __init housekeeping_setup(char *str, unsigned long flags)
 {
 	cpumask_var_t non_housekeeping_mask, housekeeping_staging;
+	unsigned int first_cpu;
 	int err = 0;

 	if ((flags & HK_FLAG_TICK) && !(housekeeping.flags & HK_FLAG_TICK)) {
@@ -138,7 +139,8 @@ static int __init housekeeping_setup(char *str, unsigned long flags)
 	cpumask_andnot(housekeeping_staging,
 		       cpu_possible_mask, non_housekeeping_mask);

-	if (!cpumask_intersects(cpu_present_mask, housekeeping_staging)) {
+	first_cpu = cpumask_first_and(cpu_present_mask, housekeeping_staging);
+	if (first_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids || first_cpu >= setup_max_cpus) {
 		__cpumask_set_cpu(smp_processor_id(), housekeeping_staging);
 		__cpumask_clear_cpu(smp_processor_id(), non_housekeeping_mask);
 		if (!housekeeping.flags) {
@@ -147,6 +149,9 @@ static int __init housekeeping_setup(char *str, unsigned long flags)
 		}
 	}

+	if (cpumask_empty(non_housekeeping_mask))
+		goto free_housekeeping_staging;
+
 	if (!housekeeping.flags) {
 		/* First setup call ("nohz_full=" or "isolcpus=") */
 		enum hk_type type;
-- 
2.25.1.362.g51ebf55