linux-kernel - Re: [bisected] Kernel v6.9-rc3 fails to boot on a Thinkpad T60 with MITIGATION

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2024 10:36:26 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>
Cc: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>,
	Erhard Furtner <erhard_f@...lbox.org>, x86@...nel.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	jpoimboe@...nel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
Subject: Re: [bisected] Kernel v6.9-rc3 fails to boot on a Thinkpad T60 with
 MITIGATION_RETHUNK=y (regression from v6.8.5)

On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 11:46:09AM +0200, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
> Boris there suggested: "perhaps we should make
> CONFIG_MITIGATION_RETHUNK depend on !X86_32":
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240403173059.GJZg2SUwS8MXw7CdwF@fat_crate.local/
> 
> But that did not happen afaics. Would it be wise to go down that path?

Am looking at the whole thing. Stay tuned...

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette