linux-kernel - Re: [bisected] Kernel v6.9-rc3 fails to boot on a Thinkpad T60 with MITIGATION

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240414090810.GBZhuc-lN6tyKbF_-M@fat_crate.local>
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2024 11:08:10 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>
Cc: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>,
	Erhard Furtner <erhard_f@...lbox.org>, x86@...nel.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	jpoimboe@...nel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
Subject: Re: [bisected] Kernel v6.9-rc3 fails to boot on a Thinkpad T60 with
 MITIGATION_RETHUNK=y (regression from v6.8.5)

On Sun, Apr 14, 2024 at 10:36:26AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Am looking at the whole thing. Stay tuned...

Something like this, I guess...

Execution goes off somewhere into the weeds during alternatives patching
of the return thunk while it tries to warn about it in the alternatives
code itself and it all ends up in an endless INT3 exceptions due to our
speculation blockers everywhere...

I could chase it as to why exactly but the warning is there for all
those mitigations which need a special return thunk and 32-bit doesn't
need them (and at least the AMD untraining sequences are 64-bit only
so...).

IOW:

diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/retpoline.S b/arch/x86/lib/retpoline.S
index e674ccf720b9..391059b2c6fb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/lib/retpoline.S
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/retpoline.S
@@ -382,8 +382,15 @@ SYM_FUNC_END(call_depth_return_thunk)
 SYM_CODE_START(__x86_return_thunk)
 	UNWIND_HINT_FUNC
 	ANNOTATE_NOENDBR
+#if defined(CONFIG_MITIGATION_UNRET_ENTRY) || \
+    defined(CONFIG_MITIGATION_SRSO) || \
+    defined(CONFIG_MITIGATION_CALL_DEPTH_TRACKING)
 	ALTERNATIVE __stringify(ANNOTATE_UNRET_SAFE; ret), \
 		   "jmp warn_thunk_thunk", X86_FEATURE_ALWAYS
+#else
+	ANNOTATE_UNRET_SAFE
+	ret
+#endif
 	int3
 SYM_CODE_END(__x86_return_thunk)
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__x86_return_thunk)

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette