linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: devicetree: fix refcount leak in pinctrl_dt_to

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 18:36:53 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@...wei.com>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
 kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
 Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Wei Li <liwei391@...wei.com>,
 Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>, Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: devicetree: fix refcount leak in
 pinctrl_dt_to_map()

>                   … Because the pinctrl_dt_free_maps() includes the
> droping operation, here we call it directly.

I find this change description improvable.

* How do you think about to avoid a typo?

* Would another imperative wording be more desirable?

Regards,
Markus