[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240415225116.GT3039520@ls.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 15:51:16 -0700
From: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>
To: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: isaku.yamahata@...el.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, isaku.yamahata@...il.com,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, erdemaktas@...gle.com,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Sagi Shahar <sagis@...gle.com>, Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>,
chen.bo@...el.com, hang.yuan@...el.com, tina.zhang@...el.com,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
isaku.yamahata@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 097/130] KVM: x86: Split core of hypercall emulation
to helper function
On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 05:28:05PM +0800,
Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > +int kvm_emulate_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > +{
> > + unsigned long nr, a0, a1, a2, a3, ret;
> > + int op_64_bit;
>
> Can it be opportunistically changed to bool type, as well as the argument
> type of "op_64_bit" in __kvm_emulate_hypercall()?
Yes. We can also fix kvm_pv_send_ipi(op_64_bit).
--
Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists