[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6adb0adb-51b7-40cd-9768-23373265388b@baylibre.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 06:58:02 -0700
From: Trevor Gamblin <tgamblin@...libre.com>
To: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc: linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
michael.hennerich@...log.com, nuno.sa@...log.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, dlechner@...libre.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pwm: axi-pwmgen: support version 2.00.a
On 2024-04-14 05:05, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello Trevor,
Hi Uwe,
>
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 04:47:22PM -0400, Trevor Gamblin wrote:
>> This adds support for the AXI PWMGEN v2 IP block. This version is
>> nearly identical to v1 other than it supports up to 16 channels instead
>> of 4 and a few of the memory mapped registers have moved.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Trevor Gamblin <tgamblin@...libre.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/pwm/pwm-axi-pwmgen.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>> 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-axi-pwmgen.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-axi-pwmgen.c
>> index 0c8f7f893a21..539625c404ac 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-axi-pwmgen.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-axi-pwmgen.c
>> @@ -32,16 +32,25 @@
>> #define AXI_PWMGEN_REG_CORE_MAGIC 0x0C
>> #define AXI_PWMGEN_REG_CONFIG 0x10
>> #define AXI_PWMGEN_REG_NPWM 0x14
>> -#define AXI_PWMGEN_CHX_PERIOD(ch) (0x40 + (12 * (ch)))
>> -#define AXI_PWMGEN_CHX_DUTY(ch) (0x44 + (12 * (ch)))
>> -#define AXI_PWMGEN_CHX_OFFSET(ch) (0x48 + (12 * (ch)))
>> +#define AXI_PWMGEN_CHX_PERIOD(v, ch) ((v)->period_base + (v)->ch_step * (ch))
>> +#define AXI_PWMGEN_CHX_DUTY(v, ch) ((v)->duty_base + (v)->ch_step * (ch))
>> +#define AXI_PWMGEN_CHX_OFFSET(v, ch) ((v)->offset_base + (v)->ch_step * (ch))
>> #define AXI_PWMGEN_REG_CORE_MAGIC_VAL 0x601A3471 /* Identification number to test during setup */
>> #define AXI_PWMGEN_LOAD_CONFIG BIT(1)
>> #define AXI_PWMGEN_RESET BIT(0)
>>
>> +struct axi_pwm_variant {
>> + u8 period_base;
>> + u8 duty_base;
>> + u8 offset_base;
>> + u8 major_version;
>> + u8 ch_step;
>> +};
>> +
>> struct axi_pwmgen_ddata {
>> struct regmap *regmap;
>> unsigned long clk_rate_hz;
>> + const struct axi_pwm_variant *variant;
>> };
>>
>> static const struct regmap_config axi_pwmgen_regmap_config = {
>> @@ -50,12 +59,30 @@ static const struct regmap_config axi_pwmgen_regmap_config = {
>> .val_bits = 32,
>> };
>>
>> +static const struct axi_pwm_variant pwmgen_1_00_variant = {
>> + .period_base = 0x40,
>> + .duty_base = 0x44,
>> + .offset_base = 0x48,
>> + .major_version = 1,
>> + .ch_step = 12,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct axi_pwm_variant pwmgen_2_00_variant = {
>> + .period_base = 0x40,
>> + .duty_base = 0x80,
>> + .offset_base = 0xC0,
>> + .major_version = 2,
>> + .ch_step = 4,
>> +};
> My first intuition to model the register differences would have been
> something like:
>
> #define ..._PERIOD 0
> #define ..._DUTY 1
> #define ..._OFFSET 2
>
> and then store a "register_step"(?) variable (which is 0x4 for v1 and
> 0x40 for v2) in the variant struct and then use:
>
> #define AXI_PWMGEN_CHX_PERIOD(v, ch) (0x40 + (v)->ch_step * (ch))
> #define AXI_PWMGEN_CHX_DUTY(v, ch) (0x40 + (v)->register_step + (v)->ch_step * (ch))
> #define AXI_PWMGEN_CHX_OFFSET(v, ch) (0x40 + 2 * (v)->register_step + (v)->ch_step * (ch))
>
> This saves a tiny bit of memory, not entirely sure this is a good idea.
> Pick it up if you like, or keep your approach, I don't care much.
>
>> +
>> static int axi_pwmgen_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
>> const struct pwm_state *state)
>> {
>> struct axi_pwmgen_ddata *ddata = pwmchip_get_drvdata(chip);
>> unsigned int ch = pwm->hwpwm;
>> struct regmap *regmap = ddata->regmap;
>> + const struct axi_pwm_variant *variant = ddata->variant;
>> u64 period_cnt, duty_cnt;
>> int ret;
>>
>> @@ -70,7 +97,7 @@ static int axi_pwmgen_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
>> if (period_cnt == 0)
>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>> - ret = regmap_write(regmap, AXI_PWMGEN_CHX_PERIOD(ch), period_cnt);
>> + ret = regmap_write(regmap, AXI_PWMGEN_CHX_PERIOD(variant, ch), period_cnt);
>> if (ret)
>> return ret;
>>
>> @@ -78,15 +105,15 @@ static int axi_pwmgen_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
>> if (duty_cnt > UINT_MAX)
>> duty_cnt = UINT_MAX;
>>
>> - ret = regmap_write(regmap, AXI_PWMGEN_CHX_DUTY(ch), duty_cnt);
>> + ret = regmap_write(regmap, AXI_PWMGEN_CHX_DUTY(variant, ch), duty_cnt);
>> if (ret)
>> return ret;
>> } else {
>> - ret = regmap_write(regmap, AXI_PWMGEN_CHX_PERIOD(ch), 0);
>> + ret = regmap_write(regmap, AXI_PWMGEN_CHX_PERIOD(variant, ch), 0);
>> if (ret)
>> return ret;
>>
>> - ret = regmap_write(regmap, AXI_PWMGEN_CHX_DUTY(ch), 0);
>> + ret = regmap_write(regmap, AXI_PWMGEN_CHX_DUTY(variant, ch), 0);
>> if (ret)
>> return ret;
>> }
>> @@ -99,11 +126,12 @@ static int axi_pwmgen_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
>> {
>> struct axi_pwmgen_ddata *ddata = pwmchip_get_drvdata(chip);
>> struct regmap *regmap = ddata->regmap;
>> + const struct axi_pwm_variant *variant = ddata->variant;
>> unsigned int ch = pwm->hwpwm;
>> u32 cnt;
>> int ret;
>>
>> - ret = regmap_read(regmap, AXI_PWMGEN_CHX_PERIOD(ch), &cnt);
>> + ret = regmap_read(regmap, AXI_PWMGEN_CHX_PERIOD(variant, ch), &cnt);
>> if (ret)
>> return ret;
>>
>> @@ -111,7 +139,7 @@ static int axi_pwmgen_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
>>
>> state->period = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL((u64)cnt * NSEC_PER_SEC, ddata->clk_rate_hz);
>>
>> - ret = regmap_read(regmap, AXI_PWMGEN_CHX_DUTY(ch), &cnt);
>> + ret = regmap_read(regmap, AXI_PWMGEN_CHX_DUTY(variant, ch), &cnt);
>> if (ret)
>> return ret;
>>
>> @@ -127,7 +155,8 @@ static const struct pwm_ops axi_pwmgen_pwm_ops = {
>> .get_state = axi_pwmgen_get_state,
>> };
>>
>> -static int axi_pwmgen_setup(struct regmap *regmap, struct device *dev)
>> +static int axi_pwmgen_setup(struct regmap *regmap, struct device *dev,
>> + const struct axi_pwm_variant *variant)
>> {
>> int ret;
>> u32 val;
>> @@ -146,7 +175,7 @@ static int axi_pwmgen_setup(struct regmap *regmap, struct device *dev)
>> if (ret)
>> return ret;
>>
>> - if (ADI_AXI_PCORE_VER_MAJOR(val) != 1) {
>> + if (ADI_AXI_PCORE_VER_MAJOR(val) != variant->major_version) {
>> return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENODEV, "Unsupported peripheral version %u.%u.%u\n",
> Hmm, is it worth to also diagnose a mismatch here? That is if the dt
> tells this was a version 2 device but the register says version 1? In
> this case
>
> Unsupported peripheral version 1.x.y
>
> might be misleading, because version 1 is supported and the problem is
> maybe only a wrong dt?
Good point, I'll look into this change too.
>
>> ADI_AXI_PCORE_VER_MAJOR(val),
>> ADI_AXI_PCORE_VER_MINOR(val),
>> @@ -178,9 +207,14 @@ static int axi_pwmgen_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> struct pwm_chip *chip;
>> struct axi_pwmgen_ddata *ddata;
>> struct clk *clk;
>> + const struct axi_pwm_variant *variant;
>> void __iomem *io_base;
>> int ret;
>>
>> + variant = device_get_match_data(dev);
>> + if (!variant)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> io_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
>> if (IS_ERR(io_base))
>> return PTR_ERR(io_base);
>> @@ -190,7 +224,7 @@ static int axi_pwmgen_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(regmap),
>> "failed to init register map\n");
>>
>> - ret = axi_pwmgen_setup(regmap, dev);
>> + ret = axi_pwmgen_setup(regmap, dev, variant);
>> if (ret < 0)
>> return ret;
>>
>> @@ -199,6 +233,7 @@ static int axi_pwmgen_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> return PTR_ERR(chip);
>> ddata = pwmchip_get_drvdata(chip);
>> ddata->regmap = regmap;
>> + ddata->variant = variant;
>>
>> clk = devm_clk_get_enabled(dev, NULL);
>> if (IS_ERR(clk))
>> @@ -224,7 +259,8 @@ static int axi_pwmgen_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> }
>>
>> static const struct of_device_id axi_pwmgen_ids[] = {
>> - { .compatible = "adi,axi-pwmgen-1.00.a" },
>> + { .compatible = "adi,axi-pwmgen-1.00.a", .data = &pwmgen_1_00_variant },
>> + { .compatible = "adi,axi-pwmgen-2.00.a", .data = &pwmgen_2_00_variant },
>> { }
>> };
>> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, axi_pwmgen_ids);
> Otherwise looks fine.
>
> Can you please add the next iteration of this patch together with the
> series adding support for v1?
Thank you, will do. I'm currently traveling so I may not get to it until
the weekend or early next week.
Trevor
>
> Best regards
> Uwe
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists