lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 16:45:42 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, thomas.lendacky@....com, x86@...nel.org,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, pgonda@...gle.com, seanjc@...gle.com,
	pbonzini@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 05/16] x86/sev: Cache the secrets page address

On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 05:01:17PM +0530, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
> +/* Secrets page physical address from the CC blob */
> +static u64 secrets_pa __ro_after_init;

Since you're going to use this during runtime (are you?), why don't you
put in here the result of:

	ioremap_encrypted(secrets_pa, PAGE_SIZE);

so that you can have it ready and not even have to ioremap each time?

And then you iounmap on driver teardown.

> +static void __init set_secrets_pa(const struct cc_blob_sev_info *cc_info)
> +{
> +	if (cc_info && cc_info->secrets_phys && cc_info->secrets_len == PAGE_SIZE)
> +		secrets_pa = cc_info->secrets_phys;
> +}

Why is this a separate function if it is called only once and it is
a trivial function at that?

Also, can the driver continue without secrets page?

If not, then you need to unwind.

>  bool __init snp_init(struct boot_params *bp)
>  {
>  	struct cc_blob_sev_info *cc_info;
> @@ -2099,6 +2079,8 @@ bool __init snp_init(struct boot_params *bp)
>  	if (!cc_info)
>  		return false;
>  
> +	set_secrets_pa(cc_info);
> +
>  	setup_cpuid_table(cc_info);
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -2246,16 +2228,16 @@ static struct platform_device sev_guest_device = {
>  static int __init snp_init_platform_device(void)
>  {
>  	struct sev_guest_platform_data data;
> -	u64 gpa;
>  
>  	if (!cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_GUEST_SEV_SNP))
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  
> -	gpa = get_secrets_page();
> -	if (!gpa)
> +	if (!secrets_pa) {
> +		pr_err("SNP secrets page not found\n");
>  		return -ENODEV;
> +	}

Yeah, no, you need to error out in snp_init() and not drag it around to
snp_init_platform_device().

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ