lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240416144438.GA17990@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 16:44:38 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
	John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
	Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: [patch V2 07/50] posix-cpu-timers: Split up posix_cpu_timer_get()

On 04/11, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> In preparation for addressing issues in the timer_get() and timer_set()
> functions of posix CPU timers.

Cough... I must have missed something, but posix_cpu_timer_get()
doesn't look right with or without this trivial patch.

It doesn't initialize itp->it_value if cpu_timer_getexpires() == 0,
this means that sys_timer_gettime() will copy the uninitialized
cur_setting->it_value on the stack to userspace?

Oleg.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ