linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] x86/fred: Fix INT80 emulation for FRED

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 11:33:30 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: "Xin Li (Intel)" <xin@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        luto@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
        dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] x86/fred: Fix INT80 emulation for FRED

On 4/16/24 11:28, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 11:23:24AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> (I think there is actually less than half the code left. This could be
>> further cleaned up by inlining the common code,
> 
> Yeah, was just thinking about that too. I'd say, though, let's let the
> FRED code settle, we start using it and then we can always unify common
> stuff later if it turns out that it won't diverge anymore.

Good plan.

>> but if I were still maintainer I would not want that for x86/urgent.
>> This patch has the very nice property for x86/urgent purposes that it
>> doesn't touch non-FRED code at all.)
> 
> Right.

:)

> I'd let Xin work in all those comments and then I'll pick it up.

Thanks!

	-hpa