[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5a8557e3-4289-4d6b-90d6-5bb23a636f66@zytor.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 11:33:30 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: "Xin Li (Intel)" <xin@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
luto@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] x86/fred: Fix INT80 emulation for FRED
On 4/16/24 11:28, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 11:23:24AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> (I think there is actually less than half the code left. This could be
>> further cleaned up by inlining the common code,
>
> Yeah, was just thinking about that too. I'd say, though, let's let the
> FRED code settle, we start using it and then we can always unify common
> stuff later if it turns out that it won't diverge anymore.
Good plan.
>> but if I were still maintainer I would not want that for x86/urgent.
>> This patch has the very nice property for x86/urgent purposes that it
>> doesn't touch non-FRED code at all.)
>
> Right.
:)
> I'd let Xin work in all those comments and then I'll pick it up.
Thanks!
-hpa
Powered by blists - more mailing lists