[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=MerqbYue_uubSkr0ta3wr+yQxfFMfk+vAUZa+C2oR+udQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 23:16:59 +0200
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: William Breathitt Gray <wbg@...nel.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] gpio: sch: Switch to memory mapped IO accessors
On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 10:31 AM William Breathitt Gray <wbg@...nelorg> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 10:21:02AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > Convert driver to use memory mapped IO accessors.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
>
> Acked-by: William Breathitt Gray <wbg@...nel.org>
>
> A minor suggestion below, but I find this patch accepted as-is.
>
> > static int sch_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > {
> > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>
> In general I think this is a good variable to define to simplify all the
> &pdev->dev appearing throughout this callback, but I'd rather have seen
> it as its own patch so we could change all the other uses of &pdev->dev
> at once without distracting from the memory-mapped I/O change of this
> particular patch. Not really necessary, but maybe at some point in the
> future a follow-up patch doing such a cleanup would be nice.
>
> William Breathitt Gray
I applied it as is, if anyone wants it, this can be sent on top of it.
Bart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists