linux-kernel - Re: ./include/asm-generic/tlb.h:629:10: error: parameter 'ptep' set but not used

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c82af143-b620-44d9-8647-f52096b851ab@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 15:51:30 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>,
 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
 WANG Xuerui <kernel@...0n.name>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
 Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>, linux-arch
 <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
 linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
 clang-built-linux <llvm@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: ./include/asm-generic/tlb.h:629:10: error: parameter 'ptep' set
 but not used

On 16.04.24 12:26, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> Hi David, Arnd, LoongArch,
> 
> In a linux-next defconfig LLVM=1 build today I got:
> 
>      ./include/asm-generic/tlb.h:629:10: error: parameter 'ptep' set
> but not used [-Werror,-Wunused-but-set-parameter]
>        629 |                 pte_t *ptep, unsigned int nr, unsigned long address)
>            |                        ^
> 
> Indeed, in loongarch, `__tlb_remove_tlb_entry` does not do anything.
> This seems the same that Arnd reported for arm64:
> 
>      https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240221154549.2026073-1-arnd@kernel.org/
> 
> So perhaps the loongarch's one should also be changed into an static inline?

4d5bf0b6183f79ea361dd506365d2a471270735c is already part of v6.9-rc1. How come
we see that only now on linux-next?

I assume we should see the same on upstream Linux with LLVM=1, correct?

If so, we should likely just drop that completely and rely on the asm-generic one:

diff --git a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/tlb.h b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/tlb.h
index da7a3b5b9374a..e071f5e9e8580 100644
--- a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/tlb.h
+++ b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/tlb.h
@@ -132,8 +132,6 @@ static __always_inline void invtlb_all(u32 op, u32 info, u64 addr)
                 );
  }
  
-#define __tlb_remove_tlb_entry(tlb, ptep, address) do { } while (0)
-
  static void tlb_flush(struct mmu_gather *tlb);
  
  #define tlb_flush tlb_flush



Thanks!

-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb