[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72mQh3O9S4umbvrKBgMMorty48UMwS01U22FR0mRyd3cyQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 12:26:57 +0200
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: david@...hat.com, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
WANG Xuerui <kernel@...0n.name>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
clang-built-linux <llvm@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: ./include/asm-generic/tlb.h:629:10: error: parameter 'ptep' set but
not used
Hi David, Arnd, LoongArch,
In a linux-next defconfig LLVM=1 build today I got:
./include/asm-generic/tlb.h:629:10: error: parameter 'ptep' set
but not used [-Werror,-Wunused-but-set-parameter]
629 | pte_t *ptep, unsigned int nr, unsigned long address)
| ^
Indeed, in loongarch, `__tlb_remove_tlb_entry` does not do anything.
This seems the same that Arnd reported for arm64:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240221154549.2026073-1-arnd@kernel.org/
So perhaps the loongarch's one should also be changed into an static inline?
I hope that helps!
Cheers,
Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists