[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADrjBPoo4uwiv1x1mNdtNUiaYkbksTre19AYT-ZtzjXaV63CyQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 11:28:30 +0100
From: Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@...aro.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org,
krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, vkoul@...nel.org, kishon@...nel.org,
alim.akhtar@...sung.com, avri.altman@....com, bvanassche@....org,
s.nawrocki@...sung.com, cw00.choi@...sung.com, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, chanho61.park@...sung.com, ebiggers@...nel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, tudor.ambarus@...aro.org,
andre.draszik@...aro.org, saravanak@...gle.com, willmcvicker@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/17] HSI2, UFS & UFS phy support for Tensor GS101
Hi Krzysztof,
On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 at 08:45, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On 04/04/2024 14:25, Peter Griffin wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > This series adds support for the High Speed Interface (HSI) 2 clock
> > management unit, UFS controller and UFS phy calibration/tuning for GS101.
> >
> > With this series applied, UFS is now functional! The SKhynix HN8T05BZGKX015
> > can be enumerated, partitions mounted etc. This then allows us to move away
> > from the initramfs rootfs we have been using for development so far.
> >
> > The intention is this series will be merged via Krzysztofs Samsung Exynos
> > tree(s). This series is rebased on next-20240404.
> >
> > The series is broadly split into the following parts:
> > 1) dt-bindings documentation updates
> > 2) gs101 device tree updates
> > 3) Prepatory patches for samsung-ufs driver
> > 4) GS101 ufs-phy support
> > 5) Prepatory patches for ufs-exynos driver
> > 6) GS101 ufs-exynos support
>
> UFS phy and host should go through their trees. What is the
> reason/need/requirement to put it into this patchset and merge via
> Samsung SoC tree?
Good point, there is no requirement for it to all go via Samsung SoC
tree I will remove that from the cover letter in future versions.
I see Vinod has already queued the phy parts of the series which is great :-)
regards,
Peter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists