linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v3 42/74] x86/cpu/vfm: Update tpm files

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <SJ1PR11MB608327EBA734DB11B2DAFC84FC0F2@SJ1PR11MB6083.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 16:43:38 +0000
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>, Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
	Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
CC: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, "linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "patches@...ts.linux.dev"
	<patches@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 42/74] x86/cpu/vfm: Update tpm files

> Thank you for your patch. It’d be great if you changed the commit 
> message summary/title to be more specific. Currently, the short log, 
> `git log --oneline`, is not very meaningful. Maybe:
>
> tpm: Use new VFM macro INTEL_ATOM_AIRMONT
>
> or
>
> x86/cpu/vfm: Use macro INTEL_ATOM_AIRMONT in tpm

Paul,

With 74 patches in this series there was a lot of automation. I'll
see about updating "Subject:" lines to match subsystem conventions
before these are applied.

Apart from that, are you OK with the contents of this patch?

-Tony