lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4v5lhnjbfnjpj4k4rme6kfphurr56ae5ngup7pcsrxhs4f7qh5@jian42uepseu>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 18:08:57 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
Cc: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, 
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, 
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, 
	JunYi Zhao <junyi.zhao@...ogic.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/5] pwm: meson: add generic compatible for meson8 to
 sm1

On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 01:57:03PM +0200, Jerome Brunet wrote:
> On Fri 12 Apr 2024 at 14:08, Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de> wrote:
> > b4 + git applied the patch just fine even without patch #4 of this
> > series. Would you be so kind to double check it works as intended?
> 
> It does, Thx.

Thank you.
 
> > BTW, b4 diagnosed:
> >
> > Checking attestation on all messages, may take a moment...
> > ---
> >   ✗ [PATCH v5 5/5] pwm: meson: add generic compatible for meson8 to sm1
> >     + Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240221151154.26452-6-jbrunet@baylibre.com
> >     + Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
> >   ---
> >   ✗ BADSIG: DKIM/baylibre-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com
> >
> > Is this only because it took me so long to reply, or is there a
> > configuration issue with the baylibre MTA?
> 
> I have no idea. This is the first time this is reported

I just picked up a patch by one of your colleagues and there the DKIM
stuff was fine. I didn't debug that further.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ