linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 5/5] pwm: meson: add generic compatible for meson8 to sm1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a2a2fa0e-2194-40db-85e7-d586c512231f@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 10:08:40 +0200
From: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>
To: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
 Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
 JunYi Zhao <junyi.zhao@...ogic.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/5] pwm: meson: add generic compatible for meson8 to
 sm1

On 18/04/2024 18:08, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 01:57:03PM +0200, Jerome Brunet wrote:
>> On Fri 12 Apr 2024 at 14:08, Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de> wrote:
>>> b4 + git applied the patch just fine even without patch #4 of this
>>> series. Would you be so kind to double check it works as intended?
>>
>> It does, Thx.
> 
> Thank you.
>   
>>> BTW, b4 diagnosed:
>>>
>>> Checking attestation on all messages, may take a moment...
>>> ---
>>>    ✗ [PATCH v5 5/5] pwm: meson: add generic compatible for meson8 to sm1
>>>      + Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240221151154.26452-6-jbrunet@baylibre.com
>>>      + Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
>>>    ---
>>>    ✗ BADSIG: DKIM/baylibre-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com
>>>
>>> Is this only because it took me so long to reply, or is there a
>>> configuration issue with the baylibre MTA?
>>
>> I have no idea. This is the first time this is reported
> 
> I just picked up a patch by one of your colleagues and there the DKIM
> stuff was fine. I didn't debug that further.

Google's DKIM key gets rotated, after while the DKIM signature gets invalid.

The best is to add a GPG signature on top of DKIM, like with B4.

Neil

> 
> Best regards
> Uwe
>