[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZiCT5rNr5oxdFsce@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 04:30:46 +0100
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>
Cc: Kairui Song <kasong@...cent.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>, Chris Li <chrisl@...nel.org>,
Barry Song <v-songbaohua@...o.com>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] mm: drop page_index/page_file_offset and convert
swap helpers to use folio
On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 01:55:28PM +1200, Barry Song wrote:
> I also find it rather odd that folio_file_page() is utilized for both
> swp and file.
>
> mm/memory.c <<do_swap_page>>
> page = folio_file_page(folio, swp_offset(entry));
> mm/swap_state.c <<swapin_readahead>>
> return folio_file_page(folio, swp_offset(entry));
> mm/swapfile.c <<unuse_pte>>
> page = folio_file_page(folio, swp_offset(entry));
>
> Do you believe it's worthwhile to tidy up?
Why do you find it odd? What would you propose instead?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists