[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGsJ_4z5R++Fp+rOj08ZJvGpnqbhBDgQ0J6YvctNDvtND2oyEg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 15:55:17 +1200
From: Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Kairui Song <kasong@...cent.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Chris Li <chrisl@...nel.org>, Barry Song <v-songbaohua@...o.com>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] mm: drop page_index/page_file_offset and convert swap
helpers to use folio
On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 3:31 PM Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 01:55:28PM +1200, Barry Song wrote:
> > I also find it rather odd that folio_file_page() is utilized for both
> > swp and file.
> >
> > mm/memory.c <<do_swap_page>>
> > page = folio_file_page(folio, swp_offset(entry));
> > mm/swap_state.c <<swapin_readahead>>
> > return folio_file_page(folio, swp_offset(entry));
> > mm/swapfile.c <<unuse_pte>>
> > page = folio_file_page(folio, swp_offset(entry));
> >
> > Do you believe it's worthwhile to tidy up?
>
> Why do you find it odd? What would you propose instead?
i'd prefer something like folio_swap_page(folio, entry);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists