linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 5/5] ARM: dts: r9a06g032: describe GMAC1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <57f94b4a-75e2-32ad-506f-954c13498cd8@bootlin.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 13:24:56 +0200 (CEST)
From: Romain Gantois <romain.gantois@...tlin.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
cc: Romain Gantois <romain.gantois@...tlin.com>, 
    "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, 
    Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, 
    Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, 
    Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, 
    Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
    Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>, 
    Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>, 
    Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>, 
    Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>, 
    Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, 
    Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, 
    Clément Léger <clement.leger@...tlin.com>, 
    Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
    devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
    linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, 
    linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com, 
    linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 5/5] ARM: dts: r9a06g032: describe GMAC1

Hi Geert,

On Thu, 18 Apr 2024, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

> > +               gmac1: ethernet@...00000 {
> > +                       compatible = "renesas,r9a06g032-gmac", "renesas,rzn1-gmac", "snps,dwmac";
> > +                       reg = <0x44000000 0x2000>;
> > +                       interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
> 
> The surrounding "soc" node already specifies the interrupt parent,
> so there is no need to repeat that. I could fix that while applying
> to renesas-devel for v6.10, but it looks like there will be a v4 for
> the rest of the series anyway?

Indeed there will be a v4 so I'll fix it.

Thanks,

-- 
Romain Gantois, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com