lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZiB_Jhj2I8YdYs64@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 16:02:14 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Xiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng@...weicloud.com>
Cc: lizefan.x@...edance.com, hannes@...xchg.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] cgroup: don't call cgroup1_pidlist_destroy_all()
 for v2

Hello,

On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 02:13:59AM +0000, Xiu Jianfeng wrote:
> From: Xiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng@...wei.com>
> 
> Currently cgroup1_pidlist_destroy_all() will be called when releasing
> cgroup even if the cgroup is on default hierarchy, however it doesn't
> make any sense for v2 to destroy pidlist of v1.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng@...wei.com>
> ---
>  kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c b/kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c
> index 520a11cb12f4..46d89157d558 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c
> @@ -197,6 +197,8 @@ void cgroup1_pidlist_destroy_all(struct cgroup *cgrp)
>  {
>  	struct cgroup_pidlist *l, *tmp_l;
>  
> +	if (cgroup_on_dfl(cgrp))
> +		return;

Can you move the test to the caller?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ