linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] kbuild: Avoid weak external linkage where possible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK7LNAT9Y5C+Shr1Pq=xrL2tcBK6rpBn05iovdZ2=kMHW5UCkw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2024 22:41:54 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
Cc: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+git@...gle.com>, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, arnd@...db.de, martin.lau@...ux.dev, 
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, 
	andrii@...nel.org, olsajiri@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] kbuild: Avoid weak external linkage where possible

On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 9:35 PM Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 20 Apr 2024 at 14:32, Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 4:57 PM Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 at 16:40, <patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hello:
> > > >
> > > > This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
> > > > by Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 18:20:42 +0200 you wrote:
> > > > > From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
> > > > >
> > > > > Weak external linkage is intended for cases where a symbol reference
> > > > > can remain unsatisfied in the final link. Taking the address of such a
> > > > > symbol should yield NULL if the reference was not satisfied.
> > > > >
> > > > > Given that ordinary RIP or PC relative references cannot produce NULL,
> > > > > some kind of indirection is always needed in such cases, and in position
> > > > > independent code, this results in a GOT entry. In ordinary code, it is
> > > > > arch specific but amounts to the same thing.
> > > > >
> > > > > [...]
> > > >
> > > > Here is the summary with links:
> > > >   - [v4,1/3] kallsyms: Avoid weak references for kallsyms symbols
> > > >     (no matching commit)
> > > >   - [v4,2/3] vmlinux: Avoid weak reference to notes section
> > > >     (no matching commit)
> > > >   - [v4,3/3] btf: Avoid weak external references
> > > >     https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/fc5eb4a84e4c
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > Masahiro, could you pick up patches #1 and #2 please?
> > >
> >
> >
> > I do not like PROVIDE() because it potentially shifts
> > a build error (i.e. link error) into
> > a run-time error, which is usually more difficult to debug
> > than build error.
> >
> > If someone references the kallsyms_* symbols
> > when CONFIG_KALLSYMS=n, it is likely a mistake.
> > In general, it should be reported as a link error.
> >
>
> OK, so the PROVIDE() should be conditional on CONFIG_KALLSYM=y. I can fix that.


You may need to take care of the dependency
between CONFIG_KALLSYMS and CONFIG_VMCORE_INFO
because kernel/vmcore_info.c has references
to the kallsyms_* symbols.

(I am still not a big fan of PROVIDE() though)




>
> > With PROVIDE() added, we will never detect it
> > at a build time.
> >
> > Do you want me to pick up 1/3?
> >
>
> ???

I will apply 2/3.
It is trivial.



-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada