[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3f53b749-46b3-d1a6-8984-c8a3fc9481ac@google.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 17:18:44 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Jianfeng Wang <jianfeng.w.wang@...cle.com>
cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, vbabka@...e.cz,
cl@...ux.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, penberg@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] slub: use count_partial_free_approx() in
slab_out_of_memory()
On Fri, 19 Apr 2024, Jianfeng Wang wrote:
> slab_out_of_memory() uses count_partial() to get the exact count
> of free objects for each node. As it may get called in the slab
> allocation path, count_partial_free_approx() can be used to avoid
> the risk and overhead of traversing a long partial slab list.
>
> At the same time, show_slab_objects() still uses count_partial().
> Thus, slub users can still have the option to access the exact
> count of objects via sysfs if the overhead is acceptable to them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jianfeng Wang <jianfeng.w.wang@...cle.com>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists