[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <653hocuhibu6xvffxblek4zoot3ryk7ilu6tbqznnliyfi3ma4@uhxfwcpsteny>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 13:31:44 -0500
From: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
To: Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>
Cc: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: qcom: gdsc: treat optional supplies as optional
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 12:31:37PM +0200, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
> On 04.04.24 23:22, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 09:58:35 +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> >> Since commit deebc79b28d6 ("clk: qcom: gpucc-sc8280xp: Add external
> >> supply for GX gdsc") the GDSC supply must be treated as optional to
> >> avoid warnings like:
> >>
> >> gpu_cc-sc8280xp 3d90000.clock-controller: supply vdd-gfx not found, using dummy regulator
> >>
> >> on SC8280XP.
> >>
> >> [...]
> >
> > Applied, thanks!
> >
> > [1/1] clk: qcom: gdsc: treat optional supplies as optional
> > commit: 6677196fb1932e60b88ad0794a7ae532df178654
>
> Bjorn, quick question: this regression fix after more than two and a
> half weeks is not yet mainlined. Is there a reason? Or am I missing
> something here?
>
I failed to propagate it, until only a few days back. It should show up
shortly.
Thanks,
Bjorn
> Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
> --
> Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking:
> https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr
> If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page.
>
> #regzbot poke
Powered by blists - more mailing lists