[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <59372e42-2eab-4efd-b7d8-d0ef6f8c2300@leemhuis.info>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 12:31:37 +0200
From: "Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)"
<regressions@...mhuis.info>
To: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>
Cc: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd
<sboyd@...nel.org>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linux kernel regressions list <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: qcom: gdsc: treat optional supplies as optional
On 04.04.24 23:22, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>
> On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 09:58:35 +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
>> Since commit deebc79b28d6 ("clk: qcom: gpucc-sc8280xp: Add external
>> supply for GX gdsc") the GDSC supply must be treated as optional to
>> avoid warnings like:
>>
>> gpu_cc-sc8280xp 3d90000.clock-controller: supply vdd-gfx not found, using dummy regulator
>>
>> on SC8280XP.
>>
>> [...]
>
> Applied, thanks!
>
> [1/1] clk: qcom: gdsc: treat optional supplies as optional
> commit: 6677196fb1932e60b88ad0794a7ae532df178654
Bjorn, quick question: this regression fix after more than two and a
half weeks is not yet mainlined. Is there a reason? Or am I missing
something here?
Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
--
Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking:
https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr
If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page.
#regzbot poke
Powered by blists - more mailing lists