linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 00/31] x86/resctrl: Move the resctrl filesystem code to /fs/resctrl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 08:51:16 -0500
From: "Moger, Babu" <babu.moger@....com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
 Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@....com>, x86@...nel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
 Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
 shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com,
 D Scott Phillips OS <scott@...amperecomputing.com>,
 carl@...amperecomputing.com, lcherian@...vell.com,
 bobo.shaobowang@...wei.com, tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com,
 baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com, Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@...cinc.com>,
 Xin Hao <xhao@...ux.alibaba.com>, peternewman@...gle.com,
 dfustini@...libre.com, amitsinght@...vell.com,
 David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, Rex Nie <rex.nie@...uarmicro.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/31] x86/resctrl: Move the resctrl filesystem code to
 /fs/resctrl

Hi Reinette,

On 4/19/24 23:06, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Hi Dave,
> 
> On 4/18/2024 8:32 AM, Dave Martin wrote:
>> Since we seem to be getting to the end of the outstanding discussion on
>> this series, what's your preference for moving this forward?
>>
>> James will be back towards the end of next week AIUI, so it should be
>> possible to apply most of the changes that have been discussed and post
>> a v2 for review fairly quickly after that.
>>
>> I'm happy to apply my fixups branch and post an untested "v1.1" for
>> review if you think it would be useful to see the de-noised output of
>> the review so far, but I don't want to fork the discussion or create
>> unnecessary work.  This interim respin would be subject to what James
>> wants to pick up.
> 
> Please post v2 with discussions complete and feedback addressed
> (unless there are some discussions that need to see how other changes turn out
> before they can complete but I do not think this applies to this series).
> 
> To create some expectations, when you submit a new series it will go to the back of
> my review queue and at this time there are three other resctrl pieces of work
> waiting for review (btw ... one of them, [1], is waiting for feedback from Arm). 
>  
>> Alternatively, I can try to follow up on the string parsing discussion
>> from patch #3 with some real code if you'd prefer to get a clean
>> interface in place for that.
> 
> We can keep discussing that, sure.
> 
> Reinette
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1711674410.git.babu.moger@amd.com/

Do you have any more feedback on this series. I have few feedbacks from
Peter. I was planning to work on v4 of this series.

-- 
Thanks
Babu Moger