linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 2/3] PCI: qcom-ep: Add support for SA8775P SOC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8cdcfa2f-7a8f-4f63-b919-df0afde7d9de@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 15:08:06 +0200
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
To: Mrinmay Sarkar <quic_msarkar@...cinc.com>, andersson@...nel.org,
 krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
 manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org
Cc: quic_shazhuss@...cinc.com, quic_nitegupt@...cinc.com,
 quic_ramkri@...cinc.com, quic_nayiluri@...cinc.com,
 quic_krichai@...cinc.com, quic_vbadigan@...cinc.com,
 quic_schintav@...cinc.com, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
 Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 2/3] PCI: qcom-ep: Add support for SA8775P SOC



On 3/29/24 16:21, Mrinmay Sarkar wrote:
> Add support for SA8775P SoC to the Qualcomm PCIe Endpoint Controller
> driver. Adding new compatible string as it has different set of clocks
> compared to other SoCs.

So is it the only change after all? What did we conclude on the NO_SNOOP
saga?

If the difference is only in the consumed clocks (and they're only supposed
to be "on" with no special handling), I don't think a separate compatible
is necessary at all

Konrad