linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 2/3] PCI: qcom-ep: Add support for SA8775P SOC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7f69c37c-07a4-07b8-9d16-dd4991f15311@quicinc.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 19:00:10 +0530
From: Mrinmay Sarkar <quic_msarkar@...cinc.com>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, <andersson@...nel.org>,
        <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
CC: <quic_shazhuss@...cinc.com>, <quic_nitegupt@...cinc.com>,
        <quic_ramkri@...cinc.com>, <quic_nayiluri@...cinc.com>,
        <quic_krichai@...cinc.com>, <quic_vbadigan@...cinc.com>,
        <quic_schintav@...cinc.com>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        "Lorenzo
 Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Wilczyński
	<kw@...ux.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 2/3] PCI: qcom-ep: Add support for SA8775P SOC


On 4/23/2024 6:38 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>
>
> On 3/29/24 16:21, Mrinmay Sarkar wrote:
>> Add support for SA8775P SoC to the Qualcomm PCIe Endpoint Controller
>> driver. Adding new compatible string as it has different set of clocks
>> compared to other SoCs.
>
> So is it the only change after all? What did we conclude on the NO_SNOOP
> saga?
>
> If the difference is only in the consumed clocks (and they're only 
> supposed
> to be "on" with no special handling), I don't think a separate compatible
> is necessary at all
>
> Konrad

Hi Konrad,
Thanks for review.
yes, we are going with the NO_SNOOP change for this platform.
And that series has been reviewed and waiting for this patch to get applied.

Thanks,
Mrinmay